Physical chemical interpretation of primary charging behaviour of metal (hydr) oxides

作者: T. Hiemstra , W.H. Van Riemsdijk

DOI: 10.1016/0166-6622(91)80233-E

关键词:

摘要: The primary charging behaviour of metal (hydr)oxides is great practical and theoretical importance. It has been shown in the literature that it possible to describe this with widely different models. This ability experimental observations not contributed a consensus respect physical interpretation. most popular models for interpretation are, essence, all combination description adsorption protons (“site-binding model”) double layer model. classical one- two-pK site-binding assume surface can be treated as chemically homogeneous. Recently, multisite complexation model formulated (MUSIC model) allows priori estimation proton affinity constants various types reactive groups present on (hydr)oxides. Large differences between capacitance (dσo/dpH) well Stern (0.2–4 F m−2 found (hydr)oxides, are discussed. A compact part derived compared AgI. From follows crystallized non-porous expected smaller than or equal around 1.7 m−2. Analysis curves colloids like gibbsite (Al(OH)3), rutile (TiO2) goethite (FeOOH) MUSIC approach leads 1.2±0.4 m−2, agreement proposed structure. Salt dependency value support assumption ion-pair formation. For silica higher which easily interpreted light structure since confined densely packed groups. Goethites specific area less 50 m2 g−1, prepared by rapid neutralization an iron salt, charge significantly better. being due presence other crystal faces and/or porosity.

参考文章(31)
T Hiemstra, J.C.M De Wit, W.H Van Riemsdijk, Multisite proton adsorption modeling at the solid/solution interface of (hydr)oxides: A new approach: II. Application to various important (hydr)oxides Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. ,vol. 133, pp. 105- 117 ,(1989) , 10.1016/0021-9797(89)90285-3
M.J.G Janssen, H.N Stein, The TiO2/electrolyte solution interface II. Calculations by means of the site binding model joint international conference on information sciences. ,vol. 111, pp. 112- 118 ,(1986) , 10.1016/0021-9797(86)90012-3
James A. Davis, Robert O. James, James O. Leckie, Surface ionization and complexation at the oxide/water interface Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. ,vol. 63, pp. 480- 499 ,(1978) , 10.1016/S0021-9797(78)80009-5
Y.G Bérubé, P.L de Bruyn, Adsorption at the rutile-solution interface Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. ,vol. 27, pp. 305- 318 ,(1968) , 10.1016/0021-9797(68)90038-6
P. Schindler, H. R. Kamber, Die Acidität von Silanolgruppen. Vorläufige Mitteillung Helvetica Chimica Acta. ,vol. 51, pp. 1781- 1786 ,(1968) , 10.1002/HLCA.19680510738
F. J. KINGSTON, A. M. POSNER, J. P. QUIRK, ANION ADSORPTION BY GOETHITE AND GIBBSITE European Journal of Soil Science. ,vol. 23, pp. 177- 192 ,(1972) , 10.1111/J.1365-2389.1972.TB01652.X
Th.F. Tadros, J. Lyklema, Adsorption of potential-determining ions at the silica-aqueous electrolyte interface and the role of some cations Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry and Interfacial Electrochemistry. ,vol. 17, pp. 267- 275 ,(1968) , 10.1016/S0022-0728(68)80206-2
Roger L. Parfitt, Roger J. Atkinson, Roger St.C. Smart, The Mechanism of Phosphate Fixation by Iron Oxides Soil Science Society of America Journal. ,vol. 39, pp. 837- 841 ,(1975) , 10.2136/SSSAJ1975.03615995003900050017X