Engineering system co-design with limited plant redesign

作者: James T. Allison

DOI: 10.1080/0305215X.2013.764999

关键词:

摘要: Rather than designing engineering systems from the ground up, engineers often redesign strategic portions of existing to accommodate emerging needs. In mechatronic systems, typically seek meet requirements a new application via control only, but this is insufficient and physical system (plant) design changes must be explored. Here, an integrated approach presented for involving partial plant that avoids costly complete redesign. Candidate modifications are identified using sensitivity analysis, then optimization problem solved minimizes cost while satisfying requirements. This formal methodology Plant-Limited Co-Design (PLCD) demonstrated robotic manipulator problem. The PLCD result costs significantly less full redesign, parametric studies illustrate tradeoff between performance. It shown propos...

参考文章(54)
Panos Y. Papalambros, Douglass J. Wilde, Principles of Optimal Design Cambridge University Press. ,(2003)
Biqing Wu, Michael Roemer, Frank Lewis, George Vachtsevanos, Andrew Hess, Intelligent Fault Diagnosis and Prognosis for Engineering Systems ,(2006)
Sanford Friedenthal, Rick Steiner, Alan Moore, A Practical Guide to SysML: The Systems Modeling Language ,(2008)
Bernard Friedland, Advanced control system design ,(1996)
Mark W. Spong, Seth Hutchinson, M. Vidyasagar, Robot Modeling and Control ,(2006)
Alex Pitti, Yasuo Kuniyoshi, Max Lungarella, Exploration of Natural Dynamics through Resonance and Chaos. IAS. pp. 558- 565 ,(2006)
Olivier L. de Weck, Christopher L. Magee, Daniel Roos, Engineering Systems: Meeting Human Needs in a Complex Technological World ,(2011)
Yan Li, G.M. Bone, Are parallel manipulators more energy efficient computational intelligence in robotics and automation. pp. 41- 46 ,(2001) , 10.1109/CIRA.2001.1013170