How to Play 20 Questions With Nature and Lose: Reflections on 100 Years of Brain-Training Research

作者: Benjamin Katz , Priti Shah , David E. Meyer

DOI: 10.1073/PNAS.1617102114

关键词:

摘要: Despite dozens of empirical studies and a growing body meta-analytic work, there is little consensus regarding the efficacy cognitive training. In this review, we examine why substantial corpus has failed to answer often-asked question, “Does training work?” We first define discuss general principles underlying interventions. Next, review historical interventions how findings from early work remain highly relevant for current cognitive-training research. highlight variety issues preventing real progress in understanding mechanisms training, including lack coherent theoretical framework guide research methodological across meta-analyses. Finally, suggestions correcting these are offered hope that might make greater next 100 y

参考文章(94)
Matthias Schwaighofer, Frank Fischer, Markus Bühner, Does Working Memory Training Transfer? A Meta-Analysis Including Training Conditions as Moderators Educational Psychologist. ,vol. 50, pp. 138- 166 ,(2015) , 10.1080/00461520.2015.1036274
Juliane Weicker, Arno Villringer, Angelika Thöne-Otto, Can impaired working memory functioning be improved by training? A meta-analysis with a special focus on brain injured patients. Neuropsychology (journal). ,vol. 30, pp. 190- 212 ,(2016) , 10.1037/NEU0000227
A. Diamond, W. S. Barnett, J. Thomas, S. Munro, Preschool Program Improves Cognitive Control Science. ,vol. 318, pp. 1387- 1388 ,(2007) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.1151148
Michiel van Elk, Dora Matzke, Quentin F. Gronau, Maime Guan, Joachim Vandekerckhove, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Meta-analyses are no substitute for registered replications: a skeptical perspective on religious priming. Frontiers in Psychology. ,vol. 6, pp. 1365- 1365 ,(2015) , 10.3389/FPSYG.2015.01365