Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Renewable Energies: Research Trends, Gaps and the Challenge of Improving Participation

作者: Rodrigo A Estévez , Valeria Espinoza , Roberto D Ponce Oliva , Felipe Vásquez-Lavín , Stefan Gelcich

DOI: 10.3390/SU13063515

关键词:

摘要: The global increase in renewable energy initiatives has been followed by the need to include social impact of any project as a core element. Significant challenges for development uncertainty assessing impacts at local scales, participation and acceptance. Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) approaches have widely used planning address these challenges. This article reviews how criteria mechanisms incorporated into decision-making processes projects. A total 184 articles were analyzed. 490 indicators that estimated identified organized nine criteria: employment, acceptance, development, health impact, governance, visual knowledge awareness, cultural value justice. Most research included analytical hierarchy process methodologies, geographically concentrated Asia Europe. participative component (92.3%), majority them based on expert consultation (75.4%). Of exclusively considered experts, almost 40% did not provide description elicitation process. Results revealed advances use MCDA but highlighted important challenges—related improving methodologies broadening stakeholders—when developing policies.

参考文章(68)
S.D. Pohekar, M. Ramachandran, Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning—A review Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. ,vol. 8, pp. 365- 381 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.RSER.2003.12.007
Theocharis Tsoutsos, Maria Drandaki, Niki Frantzeskaki, Eleftherios Iosifidis, Ioannis Kiosses, Sustainable energy planning by using multi-criteria analysis application in the island of Crete Energy Policy. ,vol. 37, pp. 1587- 1600 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.ENPOL.2008.12.011
Mhairi Aitken, Wind power and community benefits: Challenges and opportunities Energy Policy. ,vol. 38, pp. 6066- 6075 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.ENPOL.2010.05.062
Holly Longstaff, David M. Secko, Gabriela Capurro, Patricia Hanney, Terry McIntyre, Fostering citizen deliberations on the social acceptability of renewable fuels policy: The case of advanced lignocellulosic biofuels in Canada Biomass & Bioenergy. ,vol. 74, pp. 103- 112 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2015.01.003
Ines Wilkens (nee Braune), Peter Schmuck, Transdisciplinary Evaluation of Energy Scenarios for a German Village Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Sustainability. ,vol. 4, pp. 604- 629 ,(2012) , 10.3390/SU4040604
Robin Gregory, Ralph L. Keeney, Creating Policy Alternatives Using Stakeholder Values Management Science. ,vol. 40, pp. 1035- 1048 ,(1994) , 10.1287/MNSC.40.8.1035
Kate Brooks, Jacki Schirmer, Sean Pascoe, Lianos Triantafillos, Eddie Jebreen, Toni Cannard, Cathy M. Dichmont, Selecting and assessing social objectives for Australian fisheries management Marine Policy. ,vol. 53, pp. 111- 122 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.MARPOL.2014.11.023
C. Ansell, A. Gash, Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. ,vol. 18, pp. 543- 571 ,(2007) , 10.1093/JOPART/MUM032
Gavin Bridge, Stefan Bouzarovski, Michael Bradshaw, Nick Eyre, Geographies of energy transition : space, place and the low-carbon economy Energy Policy. ,vol. 53, pp. 331- 340 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.ENPOL.2012.10.066