An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems

作者: N W Marshall

DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/15/002

关键词:

摘要: The influence of two methods an automatic exposure control (AEC) setup using a simple measure detectability is examined as function x-ray beam quality for computed radiography (CR) system and indirect conversion digital (DR) system. regimes assessed were constant air kerma at the detector contrast noise ratio (CNR). A low scatter geometry was employed with spectra varying from 60 kV 1 mm Cu to 125 2 Cu. CNR measured thick Al square dimension cm by cm. Detectability quantified via nominal fixed 70 added filtration, taken c-d curves Leeds TO20 test object, four spectra. In addition, objective image parameters including modulation transfer (MTF), power spectrum (NPS) detective quantum efficiency (DQE) also both systems different It found that strategy did not maintain threshold (simple detectability) mean energy increased, either CR or DR For detector, disc increased factor 4.4 3.50% 15.4% tube potential raised kV, while 3.4, 2.27% 7.67% 120 kV. method more successful maintaining discs. changed 1.2, 4.80% 5.70% system, 5.66% (a 1.4 increase). required increase in factors 14.5 4.5 detectors, respectively. Rose SNR used show should be modulated inverse loss squared reduction frequency DQE order constant. Calculations SNR, made extrapolated DQE(0), within 25% detectors. These results suggest keeps object increasing overcome (a) (b) photon loss, due increased. AEC set up hold nearly will level contrast-detail changes. considerably if qualities.

参考文章(52)
Heggie Jc, Wilkinson Le, Determination of correct AEC function with computed radiography cassettes. Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine. ,vol. 20, pp. 186- 191 ,(1997)
Miguel Eckstein, Craig Abbey, François Bochud, A Practical Guide to Model Observers for Visual Detection in Synthetic and Natural Noisy Images International Society for Optics and Photonics. pp. 593- 629 ,(2000) , 10.1117/3.832716.CH10
D S Evans, A Workman, M Payne, A comparison of the imaging properties of CCD-based devices used for small field digital mammography Physics in Medicine and Biology. ,vol. 47, pp. 117- 135 ,(2002) , 10.1088/0031-9155/47/1/309
P. Monnin, D. Gutierrez, S. Bulling, D. Guntern, F. R. Verdun, A comparison of the performance of digital mammography systems. Medical Physics. ,vol. 34, pp. 906- 914 ,(2007) , 10.1118/1.2432072
R F Wagner, D G Brown, Unified SNR analysis of medical imaging systems Physics in Medicine and Biology. ,vol. 30, pp. 489- 518 ,(1985) , 10.1088/0031-9155/30/6/001
Ehsan Samei, Nicole T. Ranger, James T. Dobbins, Ying Chen, Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. I. Modulation transfer function Medical Physics. ,vol. 33, pp. 1454- 1465 ,(2006) , 10.1118/1.2188816
M J Tapiovaara, R Wagner, SNR and DQE analysis of broad spectrum X-ray imaging Physics in Medicine and Biology. ,vol. 30, pp. 519- 529 ,(1985) , 10.1088/0031-9155/30/6/002
P Doyle, C J Martin, Calibrating automatic exposure control devices for digital radiography. Physics in Medicine and Biology. ,vol. 51, pp. 5475- 5485 ,(2006) , 10.1088/0031-9155/51/21/006
Bénédicte Grosjean, Serge Muller, Henri Souchay, Tools and methods for exposure control optimization in digital mammography in presence of texture Medical Imaging 2007: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment. ,vol. 6515, pp. 651518- ,(2007) , 10.1117/12.709797
Ulrich Neitzel, Egbert Buhr, Gerhard Hilgers, Paul R. Granfors, Determination of the modulation transfer function using the edge method: Influence of scattered radiation Medical Physics. ,vol. 31, pp. 3485- 3491 ,(2004) , 10.1118/1.1813872