作者: P. Marttiin , F. Harmsen , M. Rossi
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-35080-6_5
关键词:
摘要: CASE environments with method customisation capabilities and Computer Aided Method Engineering (CAME) have emerged during the last few years. While many research papers discuss principles of engineering suggest requirements for new environments, we do not critical evaluations CAME using a wider framework. The aims this study are twofold: 1) to build preliminary framework comparative studies 2) increase knowledge ‘state art’ in by evaluating two environments. We adapt functional — originally built technology examine following questions: How well can be defined environment?, is supported customisable environment? chosen evaluation Maestro II /Decamerone, MetaEdit+. As an outcome, will describe what aspects these support, supported.