Professionals Play Minimax

作者: Ignacio Palacios-Huerta

DOI: 10.1111/1467-937X.00249

关键词:

摘要: During the last few decades game theory has contributed to a reshaping of important aspects of methodology Economics and other social sciences. In large part this is because language, concepts, techniques noncooperative game have become central many areas discipline. Undoubtedly, studying interaction ideally rational players greatly aids our understanding behavior real individuals, firms agents. Moreover, as Kreps (1991) remarks, "studying former should aim at understanding the latter. The point help economists understand and predict what will happen in economic, political contexts." Theoretical contributions thus feed back empirical analysis. However, testing implications proven extremely difficult in the literature. primary reason that predictions often hinge on properties utility functions values rewards used. Even when are invariant over classes preferences, data on are seldom available natural settings. Moreover, there great difficulty in determining strategy sets measuring individuals� choices, effort levels, and incentive structures they face. As result, even most fundamental predictions game-theoretical models not been supported empirically in real situations yet.

参考文章(20)
Colin Camerer, Individual Decision Making Princeton University Press. ,(1995)
Ido Erev, Alvin E. Roth, Predicting How People Play Games: Reinforcement Learning in Experimental Games with Unique, Mixed Strategy Equilibria The American Economic Review. ,vol. 88, pp. 848- 881 ,(1998)
Dilip Mookherjee, Barry Sopher, Learning behavior in an experimental matching pennies game Games and Economic Behavior. ,vol. 7, pp. 62- 91 ,(1994) , 10.1006/GAME.1994.1037
Amnon Rapoport, David V. Budescu, Generation of random series in two-person strictly competitive games Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. ,vol. 121, pp. 352- 363 ,(1992) , 10.1037/0096-3445.121.3.352
Allen Neuringer, Can people behave "randomly?": The role of feedback. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. ,vol. 115, pp. 62- 75 ,(1986) , 10.1037/0096-3445.115.1.62
James N. Brown, Robert W. Rosenthal, Testing the minimax hypothesis : a re-examination of O'Neill's game experiment Econometrica. ,vol. 58, pp. 1065- 1081 ,(1990) , 10.2307/2938300
Amnon Rapoport, Richard B Boebel, Mixed strategies in strictly competitive games: A further test of the minimax hypothesis Games and Economic Behavior. ,vol. 4, pp. 261- 283 ,(1992) , 10.1016/0899-8256(92)90019-O