The opponent-process theory of acquired motivation: The costs of pleasure and the benefits of pain.

作者: Richard L. Solomon

DOI: 10.1037//0003-066X.35.8.691

关键词:

摘要: When an unconditioned stimulus, a reinforcer, or innate releaser is repeatedly presented to human animal subjects, three major affective phenomena are often observed. First, one sees hedonic contrast. Second, frequent repeti- tion of the gives rise habitu- ation (tolerance). Finally, after repetition these stimuli, withdrawal abstinence syndrome emerges directly following stimulus termination. These dynamics organismicall y important stimuli generate new motives, opportunities for reinforcing and energizing operant behaviors, based on attributes syndromes. This article describes opponent-process theory such experientiall produced motives discusses recent research testing theory. The attempts account diverse acquired as drug addiction, love, affection social attachment, cravings sensory aesthetic ex- periences (cases in which initial reinforcers posi- tive) parachuting, jog- ging "marathoning," sauna bathing, variety self-administered, aversive like electric shocks negative). empirical laws governing establishment described. Crucial variables include quality, intensity, duration each presentation time intervals between presenta-

参考文章(43)
Abraham Wikler, Conditioning of successive adaptive responses to the initial effects of drugs. Conditional reflex : a Pavlovian journal of research & therapy. ,vol. 8, pp. 193- 210 ,(1973) , 10.1007/BF03000676
Katcher Aaron H., Solomon Richard L., Turner Lucille H., LoLordo Vincent, Overmier J. Bruce, Rescorla Robert A., Heart rate and blood pressure responses to signaled and unsignaled shocks: effects of cardiac sympathectomy. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. ,vol. 68, pp. 163- 174 ,(1969) , 10.1037/H0027495
Gerald Deneau, Tomoji Yanagita, M. H. Seevers, Self-administration of psychoactive substances by the monkey. Psychopharmacology. ,vol. 16, pp. 30- 48 ,(1969) , 10.1007/BF00405254
R. KUMAR, HANNAH STEINBERG, I. P. STOLERMAN, Inducing a preference for morphine in rats without premedication. Nature. ,vol. 218, pp. 564- 565 ,(1968) , 10.1038/218564A0
Alan Moscovitch, Vincent M. LoLordo, Role of safety in the Pavlovian backward fear conditioning procedure. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. ,vol. 66, pp. 673- 678 ,(1968) , 10.1037/H0026548
Steven F. Maier, Peter Rapaport, Kimbal L. Wheatley, Conditioned inhibition and the UCS-CS interval Animal Learning & Behavior. ,vol. 4, pp. 217- 220 ,(1976) , 10.3758/BF03214039
Leo M. Hurvich, Dorothea Jameson, Opponent processes as a model of neural organization. American Psychologist. ,vol. 29, pp. 88- 102 ,(1974) , 10.1037/H0035924
H. S. Hoffman, J. W. Stratton, V. Newby, Punishment by Response-Contingent Withdrawal of an Imprinted Stimulus Science. ,vol. 163, pp. 702- 704 ,(1969) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.163.3868.702