State Responsibility and Accountability in Managing Big Data in Biobank Research: Tensions and Challenges in the Right of Access to Data

作者: Aaro Tupasela , Sandra Liede

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-33525-4_12

关键词:

摘要: Within the European context Data Protection Directive (Directive 95/46/EC) maintains an important role in current legal debates on rights and obligations different stakeholders have processing of personal data. Biobanking data sharing infrastructures pose new ethical dilemmas interpretations we uphold with regard to This chapter examines challenges associated subject’s right access Finnish biobanking. The provides provisions for individuals confirm “as whether or not relating him are being processed”. Finland’s recent Biobank Act (688/2012) has raised concerns since it also requires biobanks provide, upon request, information regarding which may clinical (actionable) relevance individual’s health. There is, however, no governance mechanism place through common standards practices could be implemented. As a result extension mandating relate significance results health become major concern biobankers Finland. management data, research incidental findings is becoming, increasingly significant challenge all countries process drafting policy regulatory frameworks big public genomics personalised medicine. case highlights that many states facing across Europe elsewhere terms how govern coordinate biomedical

参考文章(27)
L. Frank, Epidemiology. When an entire country is a cohort. Science. ,vol. 287, pp. 2398- 2399 ,(2000) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.287.5462.2398
Conrad V. Fernandez, Eric Kodish, Charles Weijer, Informing Study Participants of Research Results: An Ethical Imperative IRB: Ethics and Human Research. ,vol. 25, pp. 12- 19 ,(2003) , 10.2307/3564300
Wylie Burke, Barbara J Evans, Gail P Jarvik, Return of results: Ethical and legal distinctions between research and clinical care American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C-seminars in Medical Genetics. ,vol. 166, pp. 105- 111 ,(2014) , 10.1002/AJMG.C.31393
Aaro Tupasela, Karoliina Snell, Jose A. Cañada, Constructing populations in biobanking. Life Sciences, Society and Policy. ,vol. 11, pp. 5- 5 ,(2015) , 10.1186/S40504-015-0024-0
Paul S. Appelbaum, Loren H. Roth, Charles Lidz, The therapeutic misconception: informed consent in psychiatric research International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. ,vol. 5, pp. 319- 329 ,(1982) , 10.1016/0160-2527(82)90026-7
Joanna Stjernschantz Forsberg, Mats G Hansson, Stefan Eriksson, Changing perspectives in biobank research: from individual rights to concerns about public health regarding the return of results. European Journal of Human Genetics. ,vol. 17, pp. 1544- 1549 ,(2009) , 10.1038/EJHG.2009.87
Wylie Burke, Hilary Burton, Alison E. Hall, Mohamed Karmali, Muin J. Khoury, Bartha Knoppers, Eric M. Meslin, Fiona Stanley, Caroline F. Wright, Ronald L. Zimmern, Extending the reach of public health genomics: What should be the agenda for public health in an era of genome-based and “personalized” medicine? Genetics in Medicine. ,vol. 12, pp. 785- 791 ,(2010) , 10.1097/GIM.0B013E3182011222
Bartha Maria Knoppers, Yann Joly, Jacques Simard, Francine Durocher, The emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: international perspectives. European Journal of Human Genetics. ,vol. 14, pp. 1170- 1178 ,(2006) , 10.1038/SJ.EJHG.5201690
Fiona A Miller, Mita Giacomini, Catherine Ahern, Jason S Robert, Sonya de Laat, When research seems like clinical care: a qualitative study of the communication of individual cancer genetic research results BMC Medical Ethics. ,vol. 9, pp. 4- 4 ,(2008) , 10.1186/1472-6939-9-4