Reuse of anaerobic reactor effluent on the treatment of poultry litter
作者： Steinhorst Alcantara Michael , Herminia Ferreira Tavares Maria , Damasceno Gomes Simone
关键词:
摘要: Anaerobic digestion of poultry litter was studied with reutilization its effluent in the process by pumping into reactor feeding, contributing to moisture content and making part feeding organic load: 0.5 1.0 kg VS/m3/day, at evaluations 1 2, respectively. The hydraulic residence time lasted 10 days for both useful volume 35 m3, a semi-continuous under field conditions. stability anaerobic verified through Shewhart control chart. Average efficiency biogas production 0.0119 m3/(kg VSadded) evaluation 0.0429 2. In second evaluation, study revealed that produced more energy as methane than spent electric feeding. According Lower Process Capability Index (Cpl), measure developed convenience engineering quantify performance process, capable operations. Key words: Biogas, Index, operational viability index, chart, statistical control.
sci-hub.se 参考文章(19)
Giorgos Markou, Improved anaerobic digestion performance and biogas production from poultry litter after lowering its nitrogen content. Bioresource Technology. ,vol. 196, pp. 726- 730 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2015.07.067
Andrew Eaton, A.E. Greenberg, Lenore S. Clesceri, Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater Published in <b>1998</b> in Washington DC) by American public health association. ,(1992)
Dan Brown, Jian Shi, Yebo Li, Comparison of solid-state to liquid anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic feedstocks for biogas production. Bioresource Technology. ,vol. 124, pp. 379- 386 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2012.08.051
Marco AP Orrico Júnior, Ana CA Orrico, Jorge de Lucas Júnior, None, Biodigestão anaeróbia dos resíduos da produção avícola: cama de frangos e carcaças Engenharia Agricola. ,vol. 30, pp. 546- 554 ,(2010) , 10.1590/S0100-69162010000300018
Rodrigo A. Labatut, Largus T. Angenent, Norman R. Scott, Conventional mesophilic vs. thermophilic anaerobic digestion: a trade-off between performance and stability? Water Research. ,vol. 53, pp. 249- 258 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.WATRES.2014.01.035
Ismail Muhammad Nasir, Tinia I. Mohd Ghazi, Rozita Omar, Production of biogas from solid organic wastes through anaerobic digestion: a review Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. ,vol. 95, pp. 321- 329 ,(2012) , 10.1007/S00253-012-4152-7
A. Gangagni Rao, Bharath Gandu, K. Sandhya, K. Kranti, Shruti Ahuja, Y.V. Swamy, Decentralized application of anaerobic digesters in small poultry farms: Performance analysis of high rate self mixed anaerobic digester and conventional fixed dome anaerobic digester Bioresource Technology. ,vol. 144, pp. 121- 127 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2013.06.076
Y. Jiang, S. Heaven, C.J. Banks, Strategies for stable anaerobic digestion of vegetable waste Renewable Energy. ,vol. 44, pp. 206- 214 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.RENENE.2012.01.012
Deepak Sharma, Teodoro Espinosa-Solares, David H Huber, None, Thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of poultry litter and thin stillage. Bioresource Technology. ,vol. 136, pp. 251- 256 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2013.03.005
Weizhang Zhong, Zhongzhi Zhang, Yijing Luo, Wei Qiao, Meng Xiao, Min Zhang, Biogas productivity by co-digesting Taihu blue algae with corn straw as an external carbon source Bioresource Technology. ,vol. 114, pp. 281- 286 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2012.02.111