Economic Policy Response to the COVID-19 Crisis: The case of Poland

作者: Konrad Sobanski

DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.3714302

关键词:

摘要: The aim of this paper is to examine economic policy response the COVID-19 crisis in Poland. investigates rationale for tools implemented, their costs, and potential consequences Polish economy. analysis concentrates on initial phase (March-April 2020). study proves that scope adjustments Poland might be viewed as relatively wide. Monetary fiscal packages implemented induce profound total new financing needed by government anti-crisis measures results a significant increase public debt ratio, from 44% 2019 51.5% 2020, state budget deficit 7.6% GDP 2020. Although projected ratio still below 55% alert threshold prescribed Constitution, makers should consider risk factors. First, under an extended lockdown scenario needs larger than initially estimated. Second, if zloty depreciates due external pressures, increases even more 30% denominated foreign currencies. Financing not possible without support central bank (NBP). quantitative easing required relative basis comparable programmes United States after 2009. Therefore, agents expect unprecedented NBP balance sheet money circulation. This have impact price levels Poland, at least long term. worst-case stagflation, characterised sluggish growth rising inflation.

参考文章(10)
Michael D Bordo, Hugh Rockoff, Not Just the Great Contraction: Friedman and Schwartz's A Monetary History of the United States 1867 to 1960 American Economic Review. ,vol. 103, pp. 61- 65 ,(2013) , 10.1257/AER.103.3.61
S. Burcu Avci, Eray Yucel, Effectiveness of Monetary Policy: Evidence from Turkey Eurasian Economic Review. ,vol. 7, pp. 179- 213 ,(2017) , 10.1007/S40822-017-0068-Y
Heike Schenkelberg, Sebastian Watzka, Real effects of Quantitative Easing at the Zero-Lower Bound: Structural VAR-based evidence from Japan Journal of International Money and Finance. ,vol. 33, pp. 327- 357 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.JIMONFIN.2012.11.020
Rudra P. Pradhan, Development of stock market and economic growth: the G-20 evidence Eurasian Economic Review. ,vol. 8, pp. 161- 181 ,(2018) , 10.1007/S40822-018-0094-4
Udo Broll, Peter Welzel, Kit Pong Wong, Ambiguity preferences, risk taking and the banking firm Eurasian Economic Review. ,vol. 8, pp. 343- 353 ,(2018) , 10.1007/S40822-018-0096-2
Marc Lavoie, Brett Fiebiger, Unconventional monetary policies, with a focus on quantitative easing European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention. ,vol. 15, pp. 139- 146 ,(2018) , 10.4337/EJEEP.2018.0037
Brett Fiebiger, Marc Lavoie, Helicopter Ben, monetarism, the New Keynesian credit view and loanable funds Journal of Economic Issues. ,vol. 54, pp. 77- 96 ,(2020) , 10.1080/00213624.2020.1720567
Nihal Bayraktar, Effectiveness of public investment on growth in sub-Saharan Africa Eurasian Economic Review. ,vol. 9, pp. 421- 457 ,(2019) , 10.1007/S40822-018-0119-Z
Scott R Baker, Nicholas Bloom, Steven J Davis, Kyle Kost, Marco Sammon, Tasaneeya Viratyosin, None, The Unprecedented Stock Market Reaction to COVID-19 The Review of Asset Pricing Studies. ,vol. 10, pp. 742- 758 ,(2020) , 10.1093/RAPSTU/RAAA008
George Kapetanios, Haroon Mumtaz, Ibrahim Stevens, Konstantinos Theodoridis, Assessing the Economy‐wide Effects of Quantitative Easing The Economic Journal. ,vol. 122, pp. 316- 347 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1468-0297.2012.02555.X