Establishing the Evidence Bar for Molecular Diagnostics in Personalised Cancer Care

作者: Daniel Schneider , Giampaolo Bianchini , Denis Horgan , Stefan Michiels , Wim Witjes

DOI: 10.1159/000441556

关键词:

摘要: While personalised cancer medicine holds great promise, targeting therapies to the biological characteristics of patients is limited by number validated biomarkers currently available. The implementation has undergone many challenges with few reaching in clinic. There have been that published and claimed be therapeutically useful, but become part clinical decision-making process due technical, validation market access issues. To reduce this attrition rate, there a significant need for policy makers reimbursement agencies define specific evidence requirements introduction into practice. Once these are more clearly defined, an analogous manner pharmaceuticals, researchers diagnostic companies can better focus their biomarker research development on meeting requirements, which should lead rapid new molecular oncology tests patient benefit.

参考文章(38)
Adrian Newland, NICE diagnostics assessment programme Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. ,vol. 93, pp. 412- 413 ,(2011) , 10.1308/003588411X582672B
Adrian Towse, Diego Ossa, David Veenstra, Josh Carlson, Louis Garrison, Understanding the Economic Value of Molecular Diagnostic Tests: Case Studies and Lessons Learned Journal of Personalized Medicine. ,vol. 3, pp. 288- 305 ,(2013) , 10.3390/JPM3040288
Lisa M. McShane, Margaret M. Cavenagh, Tracy G. Lively, David A. Eberhard, William L. Bigbee, P. Mickey Williams, Jill P. Mesirov, Mei-Yin C. Polley, Kelly Y. Kim, James V. Tricoli, Jeremy M. G. Taylor, Deborah J. Shuman, Richard M. Simon, James H. Doroshow, Barbara A. Conley, Criteria for the use of omics-based predictors in clinical trials Nature. ,vol. 502, pp. 317- 320 ,(2013) , 10.1038/NATURE12564
Christos Chouaid, Perrine Crequit, isabelle borget, alain vergnenegre, Economic evaluation of first-line and maintenance treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review. ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research. ,vol. 7, pp. 9- 15 ,(2014) , 10.2147/CEOR.S43328
Frédérique Nowak, Jean-Charles Soria, Fabien Calvo, Tumour molecular profiling for deciding therapy-the French initiative. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology. ,vol. 9, pp. 479- 486 ,(2012) , 10.1038/NRCLINONC.2012.42
Daniel F. Hayes, Jeff Allen, Carolyn Compton, Gary Gustavsen, Debra G. B. Leonard, Robert McCormack, Lee Newcomer, Kristin Pothier, David Ransohoff, Richard L. Schilsky, Ellen Sigal, Sheila E. Taube, Sean R. Tunis, Breaking a Vicious Cycle Science Translational Medicine. ,vol. 5, ,(2013) , 10.1126/SCITRANSLMED.3005950
Christos Markopoulos, Overview of the use of Oncotype DX® as an additional treatment decision tool in early breast cancer Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy. ,vol. 13, pp. 179- 194 ,(2013) , 10.1586/ERA.12.174
Catharine M Sturgeon, Michael J Duffy, Barry R Hofmann, Rolf Lamerz, Herbert A Fritsche, Katja Gaarenstroom, Johannes Bonfrer, Thorsten H Ecke, H Barton Grossman, Peter Hayes, Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann, Seth P Lerner, Florian Löhe, Johanna Louhimo, Ihor Sawczuk, Kazuhisa Taketa, Eleftherios P Diamandis, National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines for Use of Tumor Markers in Liver, Bladder, Cervical, and Gastric Cancers Clinical Chemistry. ,vol. 56, ,(2010) , 10.1373/CLINCHEM.2009.133124
Douglas G. Altman, Lisa M. McShane, Willi Sauerbrei, Sheila E. Taube, Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK): Explanation and Elaboration PLOS Medicine. ,vol. 9, ,(2012) , 10.1371/JOURNAL.PMED.1001216
S. J. Skates, A Statistical Challenge: Developing Tests for Biomarker Utility Specific to the Intended Use Journal of the National Cancer Institute. ,vol. 106, ,(2014) , 10.1093/JNCI/DJU076