摘要: In the following article, I discuss some core aspects of moral responsibility in field laboratory animal science. After a short introduction, briefly deal with entanglement normative and empirical knowledge testing. The argument will be put forward that both kinds are needed for complete account ethics taking on field. This section is followed by an overview central theories approaches their relevance debate experiments. closing chapter, address methods problems weighing human against interests plausible ethically informed way.
springer.com
sci-hub.st 参考文章(41)
Tom Regan, Carl Cohen, The Animal Rights Debate ,(2001)
Marcus Düwell, Bioethik : Methoden, Theorien und Bereiche J.B. Metzler. ,(2008)
Kirsten Schmidt, Tierethische Probleme der Gentechnik: Zur moralischen Bewertung der Reduktion wesentlicher tierlicher Eigenschaften Mentis. ,(2008) , 10.30965/9783969750780
Bernard E. Rollin, On telos and genetic engineering Springer US. pp. 156- 171 ,(1998) , 10.1007/978-1-4615-5783-8_12
Peter Singer, In Defense of Animals ,(1985)
Peter Singer, Practical Ethics: Contents ,(2011) , 10.1017/CBO9780511975950
Klaus Sallman, Der Mensch und "seine" Natur Gymnasium. ,vol. 108, pp. 485- 514 ,(2001)
Tom Regan, Peter Singer, Animal rights and human obligations Philosophy. ,vol. 53, ,(1989)
Steven Jay Schapiro, Jann Hau, Handbook of Laboratory Animal Science ,(2004)
Animal biotechnology and ethics Chapman & Hall Ltd. ,(1998) , 10.1007/978-1-4615-5783-8