Metabolic Imaging of Pain Matrix Using 18 F Fluoro-deoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Patients Undergoing L2 Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for Low Back Pain.

作者: Vivek Mehta , Yassine Bouchareb , Shankar Ramaswamy , Alia Ahmad , Theresa Wodehouse

DOI: 10.1111/NER.13095

关键词:

摘要: INTRODUCTION Nociceptive signals from lumbar intervertebral discs ascend in the sympathetic chain via L2 dorsal root ganglion (L2 DRG), a potential target for discogenic low back pain neuromodulation. Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET-CT) measures functional changes brain metabolic activity, identified by regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) as determined of F-18 Fluoro-deoxyglucose (18 F FDG) tracer within tissues. METHODS AND MATERIALS Nine patients were recruited to explore PET-CT imaging at baseline and four-weeks post implantation bilateral DRG neurostimulation leads implantable pulse generator (IPG). scans performed 30 min following an IV injection 250±10% MBq 18 FDG tracer. Fifteen frames acquired 15 min. PET list-mode raw data reconstructed normalized appropriately anatomical atlas. RESULTS study, where five analyzed. The right left insular cortex, primary secondary somato-sensory cortices, prefrontal anterior cingulate thalamus, amygdala, hippocampus midline periaqueductal areas, assessed any activity. A total 85 matrix regions delineated SUV (standardized uptake value)MAX , MEAN  ± SD, SUVPEAK calculated each these compared pre- post-L2 stimulation. Sixty-one matrices showed increase activity whereas 24 reduction CONCLUSION This is first ever study reporting multi-frame static after stimulation pain. Predominantly increased nociceptive are seen with F18

参考文章(61)
Philipp Lirk, Mark Poroli, Marcel Rigaud, Andreas Fuchs, Patrick Fillip, Chun-Yuan Huang, Marko Ljubkovic, Damir Sapunar, Quinn Hogan, Modulators of calcium influx regulate membrane excitability in rat dorsal root ganglion neurons. Anesthesia & Analgesia. ,vol. 107, pp. 673- 685 ,(2008) , 10.1213/ANE.0B013E31817B7A73
R. Peyron, B. Laurent, L. García-Larrea, Functional imaging of brain responses to pain. A review and meta-analysis (2000). Neurophysiologie Clinique-clinical Neurophysiology. ,vol. 30, pp. 263- 288 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0987-7053(00)00227-6
T Nihashi, S Shiraishi, K Kato, S Ito, S Abe, M Nishino, T Ishigaki, M Ikeda, T Kimura, M Tadokoro, H Kobayashi, T Kato, K Ito, The response of brain with chronic pain during spinal cord stimulation, using FDG-PET International Congress Series. ,vol. 1270, pp. 315- 319 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.ICS.2004.05.010
Richard B. North, David H. Kidd, John Olin, Jeffrey M. Sieracki, Farrokh Farrokhi, Loredana Petrucci, Protagoras N. Cutchis, Spinal cord stimulation for axial low back pain: a prospective, controlled trial comparing dual with single percutaneous electrodes. Spine. ,vol. 30, pp. 1412- 1418 ,(2005) , 10.1097/01.BRS.0000166502.05449.A8
Chen-Tung Yen, Pen-Li Lu, Thalamus and pain. Acta Anaesthesiologica Taiwanica. ,vol. 51, pp. 73- 80 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.AAT.2013.06.011
Christopher Barkus, Stephen B. McHugh, Rolf Sprengel, Peter H. Seeburg, J. Nicholas P. Rawlins, David M. Bannerman, Hippocampal NMDA receptors and anxiety: at the interface between cognition and emotion. European Journal of Pharmacology. ,vol. 626, pp. 49- 56 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.EJPHAR.2009.10.014
M. Moens, S. Sunaert, P. Mariën, R. Brouns, A. De Smedt, S. Droogmans, P. Van Schuerbeek, R. Peeters, J. Poelaert, B. Nuttin, Spinal cord stimulation modulates cerebral function: an fMRI study Neuroradiology. ,vol. 54, pp. 1399- 1407 ,(2012) , 10.1007/S00234-012-1087-8