Accounting for the temporal variation of spatial effect improves inference and projection of population dynamics models

作者: Qing Zhao , G. Scott Boomer , Emily Silverman , Kathy Fleming

DOI: 10.1016/J.ECOLMODEL.2017.07.019

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Population dynamics models incorporating density dependence and habitat heterogeneity are useful tools to explain project the spatiotemporal variation of wildlife abundance. Despite their wide application in ecology conservation biology, inference projection these may be problematic when residual spatial autocorrelation (SAC) is found. We aimed improve population by accounting for SAC. considered three Gompertz that incorporated effect wetland abundance Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos). compared a conventional model did not account SAC (ENV) with two novel SAC, one (a spatially autocorrelated process error) vary over time (STA) other varied (DYN). evaluated using data from 1974 1998 1999 2010. then forecasted 2011 2100 under different levels loss. The DYN eliminated had better fit than ENV STA ( Δ D ¯ = 2498.3 n d 1988.8 , respectively). coverage rate was closest nominal value among models. smaller areas decrease future loss we this study, combined practical evaluation approach, can provide reliable abundance, thus have ecological studies practices aim understand environmental changes. In particular, decision-making based on projections, used minimize risk reducing effort still high value, due its favorable performance.

参考文章(51)
F.W. Martin, R.S. Pospahala, J. D. Nichols, Assessment and population management of North American migratory birds pp. 187- 239 ,(1979)
David J. Lunn, Andrew Thomas, Nicky Best, David Spiegelhalter, WinBUGS – A Bayesian modelling framework: Concepts, structure, and extensibility Statistics and Computing. ,vol. 10, pp. 325- 337 ,(2000) , 10.1023/A:1008929526011
Alan K. Swanson, Solomon Z. Dobrowski, Andrew O. Finley, James H. Thorne, Michael K. Schwartz, Spatial regression methods capture prediction uncertainty in species distribution model projections through time Global Ecology and Biogeography. ,vol. 22, pp. 242- 251 ,(2013) , 10.1111/J.1466-8238.2012.00794.X
Jörn Pagel, Frank M. Schurr, Forecasting species ranges by statistical estimation of ecological niches and spatial population dynamics Global Ecology and Biogeography. ,vol. 21, pp. 293- 304 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1466-8238.2011.00663.X
Douglas H. Johnson, James W Grier, Determinants of Breeding Distribution of Ducks Wildlife Monographs. ,vol. 100, pp. 0- 37 ,(1988)
Richard E. Feldman, Michael G. Anderson, David W. Howerter, Dennis L. Murray, Where does environmental stochasticity most influence population dynamics? An assessment along a regional core‐periphery gradient for prairie breeding ducks Global Ecology and Biogeography. ,vol. 24, pp. 896- 904 ,(2015) , 10.1111/GEB.12323
Michael R. Kearney, Brendan A. Wintle, Warren P. Porter, Correlative and mechanistic models of species distribution provide congruent forecasts under climate change. Conservation Letters. ,vol. 3, pp. 203- 213 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1755-263X.2010.00097.X
Carsten F. Dormann, Stanislaus J. Schymanski, Juliano Cabral, Isabelle Chuine, Catherine Graham, Florian Hartig, Michael Kearney, Xavier Morin, Christine Römermann, Boris Schröder, Alexander Singer, Correlation and process in species distribution models: bridging a dichotomy Journal of Biogeography. ,vol. 39, pp. 2119- 2131 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1365-2699.2011.02659.X
Andrew O. Finley, Sudipto Banerjee, Ronald E. McRoberts, Hierarchical spatial models for predicting tree species assemblages across large domains The Annals of Applied Statistics. ,vol. 3, pp. 1052- 1079 ,(2009) , 10.1214/09-AOAS250