Economic evaluation of human papilloma virus vaccination in the European Union: a critical review

作者: Daniela Koleva , Paola De Compadri , Anna Padula , Livio Garattini

DOI: 10.1007/S11739-011-0529-3

关键词:

摘要: The human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine is a new and expensive potentially effective in the prevention of cancer. We reviewed economic evaluations (EEs) on EU to assess their potential contribution public decision-making fairly homogeneous setting where HPV vaccination has been widely adopted. A literature search PubMed selected EEs vaccines for period 2007–2010 using terms “HPV vaccines” “Costs cost analysis.” Fifteen articles were eventually selected. All studies based modelling techniques, either “cohort” or “dynamic transmission”: three utility, cost-effectiveness, remainder included both. ten explicitly assessing one two all sponsored by manufacturer, while five unrelated type funded agencies. Apart from studies, utility estimates always obtained US sources. Direct costs vaccination, diagnosis treatment related pathologies. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) results less favourable when life years gained valued rather than quality-adjusted years, genital warts excluded, booster doses extension men base-case analysis. but recommend favour strategy, which dominant English study. ICER very sensitive discount rates, followed duration protection price. At such an early stage, vaccines’ efficacy have demonstrated well-designed it not possible (and even reasonable) wait several measure effectiveness; decision-makers might benefit more designed indicate sustainable prices realistic crucial variables like coverage referring large number assumptions order show acceptable cost-effectiveness.

参考文章(53)
Diane M Harper, Eduardo L Franco, Cosette M Wheeler, Anna-Barbara Moscicki, Barbara Romanowski, Cecilia M Roteli-Martins, David Jenkins, Anne Schuind, Sue Ann Costa Clemens, Gary Dubin, None, Sustained efficacy up to 4·5 years of a bivalent L1 virus-like particle vaccine against human papillomavirus types 16 and 18: follow-up from a randomised control trial The Lancet. ,vol. 367, pp. 1247- 1255 ,(2006) , 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68439-0
Ciaran B. J. Woodman, Stuart I. Collins, Lawrence S. Young, The natural history of cervical HPV infection: unresolved issues. Nature Reviews Cancer. ,vol. 7, pp. 11- 22 ,(2007) , 10.1038/NRC2050
F X Bosch, A Lorincz, N Munoz, C J L M Meijer, K V Shah, The causal relation between human papillomavirus and cervical cancer Journal of Clinical Pathology. ,vol. 55, pp. 244- 265 ,(2002) , 10.1136/JCP.55.4.244
Suzanne M. Garland, Mauricio Hernandez-Avila, Cosette M. Wheeler, Gonzalo Perez, Diane M. Harper, Sepp Leodolter, Grace W.K. Tang, Daron G. Ferris, Marc Steben, Janine Bryan, Frank J. Taddeo, Radha Railkar, Mark T. Esser, Heather L. Sings, Micki Nelson, John Boslego, Carlos Sattler, Eliav Barr, Laura A. Koutsky, Quadrivalent vaccine against human papillomavirus to prevent anogenital diseases. The New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 356, pp. 1928- 1943 ,(2007) , 10.1056/NEJMOA061760
Quadrivalent vaccine against human papillomavirus to prevent high-grade cervical lesions The New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 356, pp. 1915- 1927 ,(2007) , 10.1056/NEJMOA061741
Veerle M.H. Coupé, Joost van Ginkel, Hester E. de Melker, Peter J.F. Snijders, Chris J.L.M. Meijer, Johannes Berkhof, HPV16/18 vaccination to prevent cervical cancer in The Netherlands: Model-based cost-effectiveness International Journal of Cancer. ,vol. 124, pp. 970- 978 ,(2009) , 10.1002/IJC.24000
Nancy Thiry, Chris De Laet, Frank Hulstaert, Mattias Neyt, Michel Huybrechts, Irina Cleemput, Cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus vaccination in Belgium: do not forget about cervical cancer screening. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. ,vol. 25, pp. 161- 170 ,(2009) , 10.1017/S0266462309090217
Ida J. Korfage, Marie-Louise Essink-Bot, Floortje Mols, Lonneke van de Poll-Franse, Roy Kruitwagen, Marjolein van Ballegooijen, Health-Related Quality of Life in Cervical Cancer Survivors: A Population-Based Survey International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. ,vol. 73, pp. 1501- 1509 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.IJROBP.2008.06.1905
D Descamps, F Struyf, M Lehtinen, G Dubin, J Paavonen, P Naud, J Salmerón, CM Wheeler, S-N Chow, D Apter, H Kitchener, X Castellsague, JC Teixeira, SR Skinner, J Hedrick, U Jaisamrarn, G Limson, S Garland, A Szarewski, B Romanowski, FY Aoki, TF Schwarz, WAJ Poppe, FX Bosch, D Jenkins, K Hardt, T Zahaf, Efficacy of human papillomavirus (HPV)-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine against cervical infection and precancer caused by oncogenic HPV types (PATRICIA): final analysis of a double-blind, randomised study in young women. The Lancet. ,vol. 374, pp. 301- 314 ,(2009) , 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61248-4
Mark Jit, Yoon Hong Choi, W John Edmunds, None, Economic evaluation of human papillomavirus vaccination in the United Kingdom. BMJ. ,vol. 337, pp. 331- 335 ,(2008) , 10.1136/BMJ.A769