A House Divided? Roll Calls, Polarization, and Policy Differences in the U.S. House, 1877-2011

作者: David A. Bateman , Joshua D. Clinton , John S. Lapinski

DOI: 10.1111/AJPS.12281

关键词:

摘要: The study of political conflict in legislatures is fundamental to understanding the nature governance, but also difficult because changes membership and issues addressed over time. Focusing on enduring issue civil rights United States since Reconstruction, we show that using current methods measures characterize elite ideological disagreements makes it hard interpret or reconcile conflicts with historical understandings their failure adequately account for policies being voted upon consequences iterative lawmaking process. Incorporating information about provides a starkly different portrait conflict—not only are contemporary parties relatively less divided than commonly thought, occurs smaller, more liberal, portion policy space. These findings have important implications broad range work uses actions compare conflict/polarization across

参考文章(44)
Michael Peress, Estimating Proposal and Status Quo Locations Using Voting and Cosponsorship Data The Journal of Politics. ,vol. 75, pp. 613- 631 ,(2013) , 10.1017/S0022381613000571
Sarah A. Binder, The Dynamics of Legislative Gridlock, 1947–96 American Political Science Review. ,vol. 93, pp. 519- 533 ,(1999) , 10.2307/2585572
DAVID W. BRADY, HAHRIE HAN, JEREMY C. POPE, Primary Elections and Candidate Ideology: Out of Step with the Primary Electorate? Legislative Studies Quarterly. ,vol. 32, pp. 79- 105 ,(2007) , 10.3162/036298007X201994
Keith Krehbiel, Douglas Rivers, The Analysis of Committee Power: An Application to Senate Voting on the Minimum Wage American Journal of Political Science. ,vol. 32, pp. 1151- ,(1988) , 10.2307/2111204
Keith Krehbiel, The Coefficient of Party Influence Political Analysis. ,vol. 11, pp. 95- 103 ,(2003) , 10.1093/PAN/11.1.95