Multi-step optimization of the filtration method for the isolation of Campylobacter species from stool samples

作者: Anne Tilmanne , Helga Marisca Kandet Yattara , Margaux Herpol , Linda Vlaes , Patricia Retore

DOI: 10.1007/S10096-019-03479-1

关键词:

摘要: The filtration method (FM) is the most effective isolation technique for Epsilobacteriaceae from stool samples. FM’s different adaptations make it difficult to compare data between studies. This study was performed in three phases optimize FM a routine laboratory perspective. In July–September 2014 (part I), on Mueller–Hinton agar containing 5% sheep blood and Columbia blood. July 2016 II), using 0.60-μm pore size polycarbonate filters (0.6-PC filter) 0.45-μm cellulose acetate (0.45-AC filter); January 2018 III), addition of hydrogen incubators studied. On 1146 stools analyzed part I, positive samples that showed no growth Butzler medium (n = 22/72, 30.6%) had improved when instead (21/22 strains vs. 11/22, p < 0.05). II, 718 stools, 91 grew with (12.7%), more 0.6-PC filter (90/91) than 0.45-AC (44/91) (p < 0.05). III, 578 were cultured, 98 FM, 7% finding significantly without (90/98, 91.8%, 72/98, 73.5%; use incubated at 37 °C hydrogen-enriched atmosphere led an almost fourfold increase rate among studied combinations. Reference centers Campylobacter should standardized protocols enable comparison prevalence space time.

参考文章(26)
LESLIE SPEEGLE, MICHAEL E. MILLER, STEFFEN BACKERT, OMAR A. OYARZABAL, Use of cellulose filters to isolate Campylobacter spp. from naturally contaminated retail broiler meat. Journal of Food Protection. ,vol. 72, pp. 2592- 2596 ,(2009) , 10.4315/0362-028X-72.12.2592
Collette Fitzgerald, Jean Whichard, Irving Nachamkin, Diagnosis and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Campylobacter Species Campylobacter. pp. 227- 243 ,(2008) , 10.1128/9781555815554.CH12
Hans Linde Nielsen, Tove Ejlertsen, Henrik Nielsen, Polycarbonate filtration technique is noninferior to mCCDA for isolation of Campylobacter species from stool samples Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease. ,vol. 83, pp. 11- 12 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.DIAGMICROBIO.2015.05.008
H. Goossens, M. De Boeck, J. P. Butzler, A new selective medium for the isolation ofCampylobacter jejuni from human faeces European Journal of Clinical Microbiology. ,vol. 2, pp. 389- 393 ,(1983) , 10.1007/BF02019476
L K Ng, M E Stiles, D E Taylor, Comparison of basal media for culturing Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. ,vol. 21, pp. 226- 230 ,(1985) , 10.1128/JCM.21.2.226-230.1985
Nadeem O. Kaakoush, Natalia Castaño-Rodríguez, Hazel M. Mitchell, Si Ming Man, Global Epidemiology of Campylobacter Infection Clinical Microbiology Reviews. ,vol. 28, pp. 687- 720 ,(2015) , 10.1128/CMR.00006-15
J.-P. Butzler, Campylobacter, from obscurity to celebrity Clinical Microbiology and Infection. ,vol. 10, pp. 868- 876 ,(2004) , 10.1111/J.1469-0691.2004.00983.X
Ó.A. Lynch, C. Cagney, D.A. McDowell, G. Duffy, A method for the growth and recovery of 17 species of Campylobacter and its subsequent application to inoculated beef. Journal of Microbiological Methods. ,vol. 83, pp. 1- 7 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.MIMET.2010.06.003