Mutations of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, EGFR, and PIK3CA genes in urachal carcinoma: Occurence and prognostic significance

作者: Orsolya Módos , Henning Reis , Christian Niedworok , Herbert Rübben , Attila Szendröi

DOI: 10.18632/ONCOTARGET.9828

关键词:

摘要: // Orsolya Modos 1 , Henning Reis 2 Christian Niedworok 3 Herbert Rubben Attila Szendroi Marcell A. Szasz 4 Jozsef Timar Kornelia Baghy 5 Ilona Kovalszky Tomasz Golabek 6 Piotr Chlosta Krzysztof Okon 7 Benoit Peyronnet 8 Romain Mathieu Shahrokh F. Shariat 9 Peter Hollosi 5,10 Nyirady and Tibor Szarvas 1,3 Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary Institute Pathology, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany 2nd 1st Pathology Experimental Cancer Research, Jagiellonian Krakow, Poland Pathomorphology, Rennes Hospital, Rennes, France Medical Vienna, Vienna General Austria 10 Tumor Progression Research Group, Hungarian Academy Sciences, Correspondence to: Szarvas, email: Keywords : urachal carcinoma, cancer, urachus, mutation, EGFR, Section Received April 08, 2016 Accepted May 29, Published June 05, Abstract Purpose: Targeted therapy represents an attractive alternative for rare tumors such as carcinoma (UrC). The aim this study was to assess the mutations most commonly affected genes in targetable EGFR-pathway UrC comapre their frequencies those found urothelial colorectal cancer. Materials Methods: Mutational hot-spots selected were tested 22 samples by pyrosequencing. patterns compared published cancers. Furthermore, we sought correlations between clinicopathological follow-up data. Results: We 11 (45%) patients. frequently mutated gene KRAS (27%) followed BRAF (18%) NRAS (5%), while no detected EGFR PIK3CA genes. No correlation mutation status parameters (Sheldon/Mayo stage, tumor grade, metastases). none correlated with progression-free or overall survival. Conclusions: pattern is more similar than However, characteristics seems be unique suggesting that clinical decision-making cannot simply adopted from carcinoma. high occurence warrants testing when considering anti-EGFR UrC.

参考文章(41)
Curtis A. Sheldon, Ralph V. Clayman, Ricardo Gonzalez, Richard D. Williams, Elwin E. Fraley, Malignant Urachal Lesions The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 131, pp. 1- 8 ,(1984) , 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)50167-6
Jianwen Zhang, Jingbo Wu, Options for diagnosis and treatment of urachal carcinoma Asia-pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology. ,vol. 9, pp. 117- 122 ,(2013) , 10.1111/J.1743-7563.2012.01592.X
Riley E Alexander, Antonio Lopez-Beltran, Rodolfo Montironi, Gregory T MacLennan, Kristin M Post, Sarah A Bilbo, Timothy D Jones, Wenbin Huang, Qiu Rao, Joyashree D Sen, Kari Meehan, Anita Cornwell, Leticia Miravalle, Liang Cheng, KRAS mutation is present in a small subset of primary urinary bladder adenocarcinomas Histopathology. ,vol. 61, pp. 1036- 1042 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1365-2559.2012.04309.X
Chen Mao, Ya‐Fang Huang, Zu‐Yao Yang, Da‐Yong Zheng, Jin‐Zhang Chen, Jin‐Ling Tang, None, KRAS p.G13D mutation and codon 12 mutations are not created equal in predicting clinical outcomes of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer. ,vol. 119, pp. 714- 721 ,(2013) , 10.1002/CNCR.27804
Peiwei Li, Han Wu, Honghe Zhang, Yu Shi, Jinming Xu, Yao Ye, Dajing Xia, Jun Yang, Jianting Cai, Yihua Wu, Aspirin use after diagnosis but not prediagnosis improves established colorectal cancer survival: a meta-analysis Gut. ,vol. 64, pp. 1419- 1425 ,(2015) , 10.1136/GUTJNL-2014-308260
Arlene Siefker-Radtke, Urachal Adenocarcinoma: A Clinician's Guide for Treatment Seminars in Oncology. ,vol. 39, pp. 619- 624 ,(2012) , 10.1053/J.SEMINONCOL.2012.08.011
S Ogino, P Lochhead, E Giovannucci, J A Meyerhardt, C S Fuchs, A T Chan, Discovery of Colorectal Cancer PIK3CA Mutation as Potential Predictive Biomarker: Power and Promise of Molecular Pathological Epidemiology Oncogene. ,vol. 33, pp. 2949- 2955 ,(2014) , 10.1038/ONC.2013.244
Gladell P. Paner, Jesse K. McKenney, Güliz A. Barkan, Jorge L. Yao, Wendy L. Frankel, Thomas J. Sebo, Steven S. Shen, Rafael E. Jimenez, Immunohistochemical analysis in a morphologic spectrum of urachal epithelial neoplasms: diagnostic implications and pitfalls. The American Journal of Surgical Pathology. ,vol. 35, pp. 787- 798 ,(2011) , 10.1097/PAS.0B013E3182189C11
Alcides Chaux, Julie S. Cohen, Luciana Schultz, Roula Albadine, Sana Jadallah, Kathleen M. Murphy, Rajni Sharma, Mark P. Schoenberg, George J. Netto, High epidermal growth factor receptor immunohistochemical expression in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder is not associated with EGFR mutations in exons 19 and 21: a study using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded archival tissues Human Pathology. ,vol. 43, pp. 1590- 1595 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.HUMPATH.2011.11.016