作者: Ullrich K. H. Ecker , Stephan Lewandowsky , Matthew Chadwick
DOI: 10.1186/S41235-020-00241-6
关键词:
摘要: Misinformation often continues to influence inferential reasoning after clear and credible corrections are provided; this effect is known as the continued influence effect. It has been theorized that this effect is partly driven by misinformation familiarity. Some researchers have even argued that a correction should avoid repeating the misinformation, as the correction itself could serve to inadvertently enhance misinformation familiarity and may thus backfire, ironically strengthening the very misconception that it aims to correct. While previous …