摘要: Abstract: "In this paper, grammatical design and creative design are shown to be compatible by introducing the notion of bounded creativity, a recognition that grammars limit but do not determine the design process."
参考文章(20)
Robert Woodbury, Jeff Heisserman, Geometric design with boundary solid grammars Proceedings of the IFIP TC5/WG5.2 Workshop on Formal Design Methods for CAD. pp. 85- 105 ,(1994)
Robert F. Coyne, Eswaran Subrahmanian, Computer supported creative design : a pragmatic approach ,(1989)
B. Faltings, J. Gero, Supporting Creativity in Symbolic Computation Second International Round-Table Conference on Computational Models of Creative Design. ,(1992)
Christopher N. Carlson, A tutorial introduction to grammatical programming Proceedings of the IFIP TC5/WG5.2 Workshop on Formal Design Methods for CAD. pp. 73- 84 ,(1994)
Rosenman, Michael A. and Gero, John S., Creativity in Design Using a Prototype Approach Design Computing Unit, Department of Architectural and Design Science, University of Sydney, 1989. pp. 207-232. CADLINE has abstract only. ,(1989)
Modeling Creativity and Knowledge-Based Creative Design Psychology Press. ,(1993) , 10.4324/9780203772881
D. Navinchandra, Innovative Design Systems: Where Are We, and Where Do We Go from Here Defense Technical Information Center. ,(1990) , 10.21236/ADA222586
K. N. Brown, J. H. Sims Williams, C. A. McMahon, Grammars of Features in Design Springer, Dordrecht. pp. 287- 306 ,(1992) , 10.1007/978-94-011-2787-5_15
John R. Hayes, Cognitive psychology : thinking and creating Dorsey Press. ,(1978)
David C. Brown, B. Chandrasekaran, Design Problem Solving: Knowledge Structures and Control Strategies ,(1989)