摘要: A standard experiment is studied to see whether the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox leads any difficulty in physically understanding predictions of quantum mechanics. The role played by measuring apparatus stressed. It found that there no problem results given ordinary
springer.com
harvard.edu
sci-hub.se 参考文章(5)
C. A. Hooker, Concerning Einstein's, Podolsky's, and Rosen's Objection to Quantum Theory American Journal of Physics. ,vol. 38, pp. 851- 857 ,(1970) , 10.1119/1.1976483
Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, Nathan Rosen, None, Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? Physical Review. ,vol. 47, pp. 777- 780 ,(1935) , 10.1103/PHYSREV.47.777
R. Mirman, Analysis of the Experimental Meaning of Coherent Superposition and the Nonexistence of Superselection Rules Physical Review D. ,vol. 1, pp. 3349- 3362 ,(1970) , 10.1103/PHYSREVD.1.3349
Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, Nathan Rosen, None, Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete? Physical Review D. ,vol. 48, pp. 696- 702 ,(1996) , 10.1016/S1876-0503(08)70375-X
N. Bohr, Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete? Physical Review. ,vol. 48, pp. 696- 702 ,(1935) , 10.1103/PHYSREV.48.696