Vaginal ring acceptability and related preferences among women in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.

作者: Jennifer B. Griffin , Kathleen Ridgeway , Elizabeth Montgomery , Kristine Torjesen , Rachel Clark

DOI: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0224898

关键词:

摘要: The vaginal ring (VR) is a female-initiated drug-delivery platform used for different indications, including HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). We conducted systematic review of VR acceptability, values and preferences among women in low- middle-income countries (LMIC) to inform further investment and/or guidance on use prevention. Following PRISMA guidelines, we structured methods search, screen, extract data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) observational studies reporting quantitative outcomes acceptability the any indication published 1/1970-2/2019 (PROSPERO: CRD42019122220). Of 1,110 records identified, 68 met inclusion criteria. Studies included 15-50+ years 25 LMIC indications prevention, contraception, abnormal bleeding, menopause. Overall was high (71-98% across RCTs; 62-100% studies), with 80-100% continuation rates RCTs favorable ease insertion (greater than 85%) removal 89-99%). Users reported concerns about getting lost body (8-43%), although actual expulsions adverse events were generally infrequent. Most disclosed partners, some worrying partner anger/violence. not felt during intercourse by 70-92% users 48-97% partners. Acceptability improved over time both within (as gained experience worries diminished), chronological device popularized). Women expressed accessible, long-acting, partner-approved that prevent pregnancy, can be without knowledge, have no impact sex few side effects. This limited lack standardization measures study heterogeneity. suggests most positive view increases familiarity use; and, many would consider an acceptable future delivery prevention or other indications.

参考文章(100)
Melissa Tepe, Renee Mestad, Gina Secura, Jenifer E. Allsworth, Tessa Madden, Jeffrey F. Peipert, Association Between Tampon Use and Choosing the Contraceptive Vaginal Ring Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 115, pp. 735- 739 ,(2010) , 10.1097/AOG.0B013E3181D41C4A
Harold A. Nash, Vivian Brache, Francisco Alvarez-Sanchez, Theodore M. Jackanicz, Troy M. Harmon, Estradiol delivery by vaginal rings: potential for hormone replacement therapy Maturitas. ,vol. 26, pp. 27- 33 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0378-5122(96)01072-9
Cesare Battaglia, Fulvia Mancini, Raffaella Fabbri, Nicola Persico, Paolo Busacchi, Fabio Facchinetti, Stefano Venturoli, Polycystic ovary syndrome and cardiovascular risk in young patients treated with drospirenone-ethinylestradiol or contraceptive vaginal ring. A prospective, randomized, pilot study Fertility and Sterility. ,vol. 94, pp. 1417- 1425 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.FERTNSTERT.2009.05.044
David D. Rahn, Cassandra Carberry, Tatiana V. Sanses, Mamta M. Mamik, Renée M. Ward, Kate V. Meriwether, Cedric K. Olivera, Husam Abed, Ethan M. Balk, Miles Murphy, Vaginal estrogen for genitourinary syndrome of menopause: a systematic review. Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 124, pp. 1147- 1156 ,(2014) , 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000526
Tina R. Raine, Laura B. Epstein, Cynthia C. Harper, Beth A. Brown, Cherrie B. Boyer, Attitudes toward the vaginal ring and transdermal patch among adolescents and young women. Journal of Adolescent Health. ,vol. 45, pp. 262- 267 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.JADOHEALTH.2009.02.007
M. Latka, Female-initiated barrier methods for the prevention of STI/HIV: Where are we now? where should we go? Journal of Urban Health-bulletin of The New York Academy of Medicine. ,vol. 78, pp. 571- 580 ,(2001) , 10.1093/JURBAN/78.4.571
Suchitra N. Pandit, Anahita R. Chauhan, Manjula Anagani, Sanjeeva Reddy, Ashish Birla, Subrat K. Ray, Multicenter Study of Contraceptive Vaginal Ring (NuvaRing®) in Normal Daily Practice in Indian Women The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India. ,vol. 64, pp. 409- 416 ,(2014) , 10.1007/S13224-014-0559-7
M Lusti-Narasimhan, M Merialdi, B Holt, Multipurpose prevention technologies: maximising positive synergies. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. ,vol. 121, pp. 251- 251 ,(2014) , 10.1111/1471-0528.12606
Andrea Thurman, Meredith Clark, Jennifer Hurlburt, Gustavo Doncel, Intravaginal rings as delivery systems for microbicides and multipurpose prevention technologies. International Journal of Women's Health. ,vol. 5, pp. 695- 708 ,(2013) , 10.2147/IJWH.S34030
Ellen E. Hardy, Quintina Reyes, Fernando Gomez, Ramon Portes-Carrasco, Anibal Faundes, User's Perception of the Contraceptive Vaginal Ring: A Field Study in Brazil and the Dominican Republic Studies in Family Planning. ,vol. 14, pp. 284- ,(1983) , 10.2307/1965397