Risk-informed decision support for assessing the costs and benefits of counter-terrorism protective measures for infrastructure

作者: Mark G. Stewart

DOI: 10.1016/J.IJCIP.2009.09.001

关键词:

摘要: Abstract The paper describes risk-informed decision support for assessing the costs and benefits of counter-terrorism (CT) protective measures infrastructure. Such a framework needs to consider threat scenarios probabilities, value human life, physical (direct) damage, indirect risk reduction measure costs. Probabilistic terrorism assessments that quantify are conducted three items infrastructure using representative cost vulnerability data. illustrative examples show under what combination reduction, probability, fatality damage CT would be cost-effective United States building, bridge aviation It was found if losses (such as business interruption, loss GDP, etc.) considered, then even terrorist probability is not high. Opportunity can considerable, which makes less cost-effective.

参考文章(50)
Rachel Kaganoff Stern, Lloyd Dixon, Compensation for Losses from the 9/11 Attacks RAND Corporation. ,(2004)
Henry Ergas, Mark Stewart, Carl J. Ungerer, Scott Hook, Risky business: Measuring the costs and benefits of counter-terrorism spending Australian Strategic Policy Institute. ,(2008)
James Elliott Moore, None, The Economic Costs and Consequences of Terrorism ,(2008)
R. E. Melchers, Mark G. Stewart, Probabilistic Risk Assessment of Engineering Systems ,(1997)
Tom LaTourrette, Henry H Willis, Samuel Neill, Scot Hickey, Terrence K Kelly, Terrorism Risk Modeling for Intelligence Analysis and Infrastructure Protection ,(2007)
Gabriele Bammer, Uncertainty and Risk Published in <b>2008</b> in London Sterling VA by Earthscan. pp. 261- 268 ,(2008) , 10.4324/9781849773607
David J. Lakamp, Gill H. McCarthy, A Cost Benefit Analysis of Security at the Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School. ,(2003) , 10.21236/ADA420592