Feeding behavior, ruminal fermentation, and performance of pregnant beef cows differing in phenotypic residual feed intake offered grass silage.

作者: C. Fitzsimons , D. A. Kenny , A. G. Fahey , M. McGee

DOI: 10.2527/JAS.2013-7438

关键词:

摘要: This study examined the relationship of residual feed intake (RFI) and performance with feeding behavior ruminal fermentation variables in preg- nant beef cows offered a grass silage diet. Individual DMI (dry matter digestibility = 666 g/kg) was recorded on 47 gestating (mean gestation d 166, SD 26 d) Simmental × Holstein-Friesian for period 80 d. Cow BW, BCS, skel- etal measurements, ultrasonically scanned muscle fat depth, visual muscular score, fermentation, blood metabolites, were measured. Phenotypic RFI calculated as actual minus expected DMI. Expected computed each animal by regressing conceptus-adjusted mean BW 0.75 ADG over an 80-d period. Within breed, ranked into low (efficient), medium, or high groups. Overall (SD) values (kg/d), RFI, initial conceptus- adjusted 8.41 (1.09) kg/d, 0.01 (0.13) 646 (70) kg, −0.07 (0.32) respectively. High-RFI ate 25% 8% more than low- medium-RFI cows, Live weight not cor- related (P > 0.05), positively correlated (r 0.80; P 0.05) ADG, muscu- lar scores, skeletal calf birth weight, calving difficulty scores. All ultra- sonic depth measurements similar high-RFI except back thickness change, where low-RFI gained less < cows. Low-RFI had greater pH lower ammonia concentrations fluid compared to their contemporaries. Low- fewer 0.001) daily events, but these longer duration (min·feed event −1 ·d ). Despite this, total feed- ing shorter 0.001; min/d) lon- ger nonfeeding events showed that those consumed levels productivity, spent time engaged feeding-behavior-related activities, differed parameters. Feeding are significant (17%) contributory factor variation pregnant silage.

参考文章(55)
Michael J Drennan, Mark McGee, Patrick J. Caffrey, Effect of suckler cow genotype on energy requirements and performance in winter and subsequently at pasture Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research. ,vol. 44, pp. 157- 171 ,(2005)
A. Susenbeth, T. Dickel, K.-H. Südekum, W. Drochner, H. Steingaß, Energy requirements of cattle for standing and for ingestion, estimated by a ruminal emptying technique Journal of Animal Science. ,vol. 82, pp. 129- 136 ,(2004) , 10.2527/2004.821129X
Darryl J. Gibb, Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle, 7th ed Canadian Veterinary Journal-revue Veterinaire Canadienne. ,vol. 38, pp. 662- 662 ,(1997)
G. Alderman, B. R. Cottrill, Energy and protein requirements of ruminants. Energy and protein requirements of ruminants.. ,(1996)
Jan Dijkstra, John Michael Forbes, James France, Quantitative Aspects of Ruminant Digestion and Metabolism ,(2005)
J. D. Nkrumah, E. K. Okine, G. W. Mathison, K. Schmid, C. Li, J. A. Basarab, M. A. Price, Z. Wang, S. S. Moore, Relationships of feedlot feed efficiency, performance, and feeding behavior with metabolic rate, methane production, and energy partitioning in beef cattle Journal of Animal Science. ,vol. 84, pp. 145- 153 ,(2006) , 10.2527/2006.841145X
R. S. Hegarty, Genotype differences and their impact on digestive tract function of ruminants: a review Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture. ,vol. 44, pp. 459- 467 ,(2004) , 10.1071/EA02148
J. W. Golden, M. S. Kerley, W. H. Kolath, The relationship of feeding behavior to residual feed intake in crossbred Angus steers fed traditional and no-roughage diets. Journal of Animal Science. ,vol. 86, pp. 180- 186 ,(2008) , 10.2527/JAS.2005-569