Industrial Policy: Growth Elixir or Poison?

作者: H. Pack

DOI: 10.1093/WBRO/15.1.47

关键词:

摘要: The debate about industrial policy occasioned by the East Asian financial crisis is latest chapter in an ongoing discussion effectiveness of selective government intervention fostering rapid growth. that began Republic Korea 1997 and weak growth Japan over much 1990s have prompted a reexamination actions two countries pursued sectorial selectivity most intensively. If indeed policies were important accelerating growth, there may be lessons for other still early stages industrialization. Conversely, if magnitude contribution was small, more conventional should unless it assumed governments can improve on efforts Korea.

参考文章(45)
Howard Pack, Larry E. Westphal, Industrial strategy and technological change Journal of Development Economics. ,vol. 22, pp. 87- 128 ,(1986) , 10.1016/0304-3878(86)90053-2
Paul Krugman, Strategic Trade Policy and the New International Economics Research Papers in Economics. ,vol. 1, ,(1986)
Krueger, Anne Tuncer, Baran, An empirical test of the infant industry argument The American Economic Review. ,vol. 72, pp. 1- ,(1982)
Joseph E. Stiglitz, The Role of the State in Financial Markets The World Bank Economic Review. ,vol. 7, pp. 1- ,(1993) , 10.1093/WBER/7.SUPPL_1.19
Syrquin, Moshe Chenery, Hollis B., Patterns of Development, 1950 to 1983 ,(1989)
Tibor. Scitovsky, Maurice. Scott, Ian. Little, Industry and Trade in Some Developing Countries ,(1970)
Kenneth J Arrow, Moses Abramovitz, The Allocation of Economic Resources ,(1959)
Robert Z Lawrence, Japan's Different Trade Regime: An Analysis with Particular Reference to Keiretsu Journal of Economic Perspectives. ,vol. 7, pp. 3- 19 ,(1993) , 10.1257/JEP.7.3.3
Tibor Scitovsky, Two Concepts of External Economies Journal of Political Economy. ,vol. 62, pp. 143- 151 ,(1954) , 10.1086/257498