Discriminating between Tornadic and Non-Tornadic Supercells: A New Hodograph Technique

作者: John M. Esterheld , Donald J. Giuliano

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: Thompson and Edwards (2000) first noted a prominent hodograph kink separating primarily speed shear from directional in the environments of some supercells producing significant tornadoes. Responding to this observation, we compared similar thermodynamic between Moore, Oklahoma tornado 3 May 1999 non-tornadic supercell thunderstorms occurring north Texas on 23 April 2003. The results suggest that certain characteristics could discriminate tornadic supercells. This combination features consisted strong (> 10 m s -1 ) nearly straight-line below 500 above ground level (AGL) storm-relative inflow orthogonal base segment at m, yielding almost purely streamwise inflow. We evaluated hypothesis by analyzing 67 severe convective events, 65 which were supercells, 1997-2004, dividing events into non-tornadic, weak-tornadic (F0-­F1), significant-tornadic (F2-­F5) storm classes. show improved discrimination classes for 10-­500 helicity bulk magnitude when 10-­1000 calculations same. Also, histograms critical angle (defined vector vector) revealed storms, particular tended be characterized angles near 90°, whereas storms not. Although are based relatively small sample, they careful consideration evolution low-level both time space relation motion can potentially valuable aid forecasting

参考文章(30)
David J. Stensrud, Michael H. Jain, Kenneth W. Howard, Robert A. Maddox, Operational Systems for Observing the Lower Atmosphere: Importance of Data Sampling and Archival Procedures Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology. ,vol. 7, pp. 930- 937 ,(1990) , 10.1175/1520-0426(1990)007<0930:OSFOTL>2.0.CO;2
Harold E. Brooks, Charles A. Doswell, Jeremy Cooper, On the Environments of Tornadic and Nontornadic Mesocyclones Weather and Forecasting. ,vol. 9, pp. 606- 618 ,(1994) , 10.1175/1520-0434(1994)009<0606:OTEOTA>2.0.CO;2
K. A. Browning, R. J. Donaldson, Airflow and Structure of a Tornadic Storm Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences. ,vol. 20, pp. 533- 545 ,(1963) , 10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020<0533:AASOAT>2.0.CO;2
Bob L. Weber, David B. Wuertz, Comparison of Rawinsonde and Wind Profiler Radar Measurements Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology. ,vol. 7, pp. 157- 174 ,(1990) , 10.1175/1520-0426(1990)007<0157:CORAWP>2.0.CO;2
Richard Rotunno, Joseph B. Klemp, The Influence of the Shear-Induced Pressure Gradient on Thunderstorm Motion Monthly Weather Review. ,vol. 110, pp. 136- 151 ,(1982) , 10.1175/1520-0493(1982)110<0136:TIOTSI>2.0.CO;2
John D. Marwitz, The Structure and Motion of Severe Hailstorms. Part I: Supercell Storms Journal of Applied Meteorology. ,vol. 11, pp. 180- 188 ,(1972) , 10.1175/1520-0450(1972)011<0166:TSAMOS>2.0.CO;2
Paul Markowski, Christina Hannon, Jeff Frame, Elise Lancaster, Albert Pietrycha, Roger Edwards, Richard L. Thompson, Characteristics of Vertical Wind Profiles near Supercells Obtained from the Rapid Update Cycle Weather and Forecasting. ,vol. 18, pp. 1262- 1272 ,(2003) , 10.1175/1520-0434(2003)018<1262:COVWPN>2.0.CO;2
Thomas A. Jones, Kevin M. McGrath, John T. Snow, Association between NSSL Mesocyclone Detection Algorithm-Detected Vortices and Tornadoes Weather and Forecasting. ,vol. 19, pp. 872- 890 ,(2004) , 10.1175/1520-0434(2004)019<0872:ABNMDA>2.0.CO;2