摘要: Recent labor markets developments, including mismatches in the skills of workers and jobs, extended unemployment benefits, very high rates long-term joblessness, may be impeding return to \\"normal\\" around 5%. An examination alternative measures market conditions suggests that rate have risen as much 1.7 percentage points about 6.7%, although this increase is likely prove temporary. Even with such an increase, sizable slack expected persist for years.
frbsf.org参考文章(18)
Athanasios Orphanides, Commentary: the United States labor market: status quio pr a new normal? Proceedings - Economic Policy Symposium - Jackson Hole. pp. 453- 462 ,(2012)
John Krainer, Stephen F. LeRoy, Risky mortgages and mortgage default premiums FRBSF Economic Letter. ,(2010)
John C. Williams, Will the financial crisis have a lasting effect on unemployment Speech. ,(2011)
Robert G. Valletta, Katherine Kuang, Is structural unemployment on the rise FRBSF Economic Letter. ,(2010)
Stephen Terry, Edward S. Knotek, How Will Unemployment Fare Following the Recession Econometric Reviews. ,vol. 94, pp. 7- ,(2009)
Douglas W. Elmendorf, The Budget and Economic Outlook: Fiscal Years 2013 to 2023 ,(2013)
Giovanni Peri, The effect of immigrants on U.S. employment and productivity FRBSF Economic Letter. ,(2010)
Christopher M. James, Mortgage-backed securities: how important is "skin in the game"? FRBSF Economic Letter. ,(2010)
Bart Hobijn, Regis Barnichon, Michael Elsby, Aysegul Sahin, Which Industries Are Shifting the Beveridge Curve Monthly Labor Review. ,vol. 135, pp. 25- 37 ,(2012)
Uluc Aysun, Florence Bouvet, Richard Hofler, An alternative measure of structural unemployment Economic Modelling. ,vol. 38, pp. 592- 603 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.ECONMOD.2014.02.009