The Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29)A new patient-based outcome measure

作者: Jeremy Hobart , Donna Lamping , Ray Fitzpatrick , Afsane Riazi , Alan Thompson

DOI: 10.1093/BRAIN/124.5.962

关键词:

摘要: Changes in health policy have underlined the importance of evidence-based clinical practice and rigorous evaluation patient-based outcomes. As outcome measurement is particularly important treatment trials multiple sclerosis, a number disease-specific instruments been developed recently. One limitation these that none was using standard psychometric approach reducing large item pool generated from people with sclerosis. Consequently, an measure for sclerosis disease specific combines patient perspective methods will complement existing instruments. The aim this study to develop such measure. Standard were used. A 129 questionnaire items interviews 30 expert opinion literature review. administered by postal survey 1530 selected randomly Multiple Sclerosis Society membership database. Redundant those limited properties removed. remaining (n = 41) grouped into scales factor analysis, then refined form Impact Scale (MSIS-29), instrument measuring physical (20 items) psychological (nine impact Five MSIS-29 (data quality, scaling assumptions, acceptability, reliability validity) examined separate 1250 members. preliminary responsiveness undertaken 55 admitted rehabilitation intravenous steroid relapses. satisfied all criteria. Data quality excellent, missing data low (maximum 3.9%), test-re-test high (r 0.65-0.90) scale scores could be >98% respondents. Item descriptive statistics, convergent discriminant validity, analysis indicated it legitimate generate summing items. showed good variability, small floor ceiling effects, internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha

参考文章(51)
Nicholas G. LaRocca, Paul G. Ritvo, Deborah M. Miller, Jill S. Fischer, Howard Andrews, Donald W. Paty, “Quality of Life” Assessment in Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Trials: Current Status and Strategies for Improving Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Trial Design Springer London. pp. 145- 160 ,(1996) , 10.1007/978-1-4471-1271-6_7
Anita Stewart, John Ware, Measuring Functioning and Well-Being: The Medical Outcomes Study Approach Duke University Press. ,(1992) , 10.7249/CB361
Maurice J. Staquet, Ron D. Hays, Peter M. Fayers, Quality of life assessment in clinical trials : methods and practice Oxford University Press. ,(1998)
John E. Ware, SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales : a user's manual Health Assessment Lab. ,(1994)
John P. Bailey, Wilson H. Guertin, Introduction to modern factor analysis Distributed by Edward Brothers. ,(1970)
Ian McDowell, Crispin Jenkinson, Development standards for health measures. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. ,vol. 1, pp. 238- 246 ,(1996) , 10.1177/135581969600100410
Lee J. Cronbach, Paul E. Meehl, Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin. ,vol. 52, pp. 281- 302 ,(1955) , 10.1037/H0040957
Jeremy Hobart, Jenny Freeman, Alan Thompson, Kurtzke scales revisited: the application of psychometric methods to clinical intuition Brain. ,vol. 123, pp. 1027- 1040 ,(2000) , 10.1093/BRAIN/123.5.1027