Sex Differences in Academic Rank in US Medical Schools in 2014

作者: Anupam B. Jena , Dhruv Khullar , Oliver Ho , Andrew R. Olenski , Daniel M. Blumenthal

DOI: 10.1001/JAMA.2015.10680

关键词:

摘要: Importance The proportion of women at the rank full professor in US medical schools has not increased since 1980 and remains below that men. Whether differences age, experience, specialty, research productivity between sexes explain persistent disparities faculty been studied. Objective To analyze sex among academic physicians. Design, Setting, Participants We analyzed using a cross-sectional comprehensive database physicians with school appointments 2014 (91 073 physicians; 9.1% all physicians), linked to information on physician sex, years residency, authored publications, National Institutes Health (NIH) funding, clinical trial investigation. estimated professorship, as well combined outcome associate or adjusting for these factors multilevel (hierarchical) model. also how varied specialty whether were more prevalent ranked highly research. Exposures Physician sex. Main Outcomes Measures Academic rank. Results In all, there 30 464 who vs 60 609 Of those, 3623 (11.9%) 17 354 men (28.6%) had full-professor appointments, an absolute difference −16.7% (95% CI, −17.3% −16.2%). Women younger disproportionately represented internal medicine pediatrics. mean total number publications was 11.6 24.8 men, −13.2 −13.6 −12.7); first- last-author 5.9 13.7 −7.8 −8.1 −7.5). Among NIH grant, 6.8% (2059 464) 10.3% (6237 609) −3.5% −3.9% −3.1%). 6.4% 8.8% registered ClinicalTrials.gov, −2.4% −2.8% −2.0%). After multivariable adjustment, less likely than have achieved status (absolute adjusted proportion, −3.8%; 95% −4.4% −3.3%). Sex-differences professorship present across specialties did vary according physician’s terms funding. Conclusions Relevance schools, rank, substantially be professors, after accounting measures productivity.

参考文章(29)
Jean Anderson Eloy, Peter F. Svider, Deepa V. Cherla, Lucia Diaz, Olga Kovalerchik, Kevin M. Mauro, Soly Baredes, Sujana S. Chandrasekhar, Gender disparities in research productivity among 9952 academic physicians Laryngoscope. ,vol. 123, pp. 1865- 1875 ,(2013) , 10.1002/LARY.24039
Lila A. Wallis, Advancement of Men and Women in Medical Academia JAMA. ,vol. 246, pp. 2350- 2353 ,(1981) , 10.1001/JAMA.1981.03320200036022
Phyllis Carr, Robert H. Friedman, Mark A. Moskowitz, Lewis E. Kazis, Harrison G. Weed, Research, academic rank, and compensation of women and men faculty in academic general internal medicine. Journal of General Internal Medicine. ,vol. 7, pp. 418- 423 ,(1992) , 10.1007/BF02599159
Bonnie J. Tesch, Promotion of Women Physicians in Academic Medicine JAMA. ,vol. 273, pp. 1022- 1025 ,(1995) , 10.1001/JAMA.1995.03520370064038
Mary Beth Hamel, Julie R. Ingelfinger, Elizabeth Phimister, Caren G. Solomon, Women in academic medicine--progress and challenges. The New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 355, pp. 310- 312 ,(2006) , 10.1056/NEJME068143
Phyllis L Carr, Arlene S Ash, Robert H Friedman, Amy Scaramucci, Rosalind C Barnett, Laura EDM Szalacha, Anita Palepu, Mark A Moskowitz, Relation of Family Responsibilities and Gender to the Productivity and Career Satisfaction of Medical Faculty Annals of Internal Medicine. ,vol. 129, pp. 532- 538 ,(1998) , 10.7326/0003-4819-129-7-199810010-00004
Reshma Jagsi, Kent A. Griffith, Abigail Stewart, Dana Sambuco, Rochelle DeCastro, Peter A. Ubel, Gender Differences in Salary in a Recent Cohort of Early-Career Physician–Researchers Academic Medicine. ,vol. 88, pp. 1689- 1699 ,(2013) , 10.1097/ACM.0B013E3182A71519
Phyllis L Carr, Robert H Friedman, Mark A Moskowitz, Lewis E Kazis, Comparing the Status of Women and Men in Academic Medicine Annals of Internal Medicine. ,vol. 119, pp. 908- 913 ,(1993) , 10.7326/0003-4819-119-9-199311010-00008
Patricia A. Thomas, Marie Diener-West, Marcia I. Canto, Don R. Martin, Wendy S. Post, Michael B. Streiff, Results of an Academic Promotion and Career Path Survey of Faculty at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Academic Medicine. ,vol. 79, pp. 258- 264 ,(2004) , 10.1097/00001888-200403000-00013