Binaural summation, binaural unmasking and fluctuating masker benefit in bimodal and bilateral adult cochlear implant users.

作者: Feike De Graaff , Robert H Eikelboom , Cathy Sucher , Sophia E Kramer , Cas Smits

DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2021.1894686

关键词:

摘要: Objectives The number of bilateral adult cochlear implant (CI) users and bimodal CI is expanding worldwide. addition a hearing aid (HA) in the contralateral non-implanted ear (bimodal) or second (bilateral) can provide with some benefits associated listening two ears. Our was to examine whether demonstrate binaural summation, unmasking fluctuating masker benefit. Methods Direct audio input used present stimuli 10 CochlearTM users. Speech recognition noise (speech reception threshold, SRT) assessed monaurally, diotically (identical signals both devices) dichotically (antiphasic speech) different masking noises (steady-state interrupted), using digits-in-noise test. Results Bilateral demonstrated trend towards better SRTs CIs than one CI. Bimodal showed no difference between SRT for alone. No significant differences were found diotic dichotic conditions either group. Analyses electrodograms created from that substantial parts interaural speech cues preserved Advanced Combination Encoder, an n-of-m channel selection coding strategy, by significantly interrupted steady-state Conclusion but did not. group A large benefit

参考文章(45)
Teresa Y. C. Ching, Emma van Wanrooy, Mandy Hill, Harvey Dillon, Binaural redundancy and inter-aural time difference cues for patients wearing a cochlear implant and a hearing aid in opposite ears International Journal of Audiology. ,vol. 44, pp. 513- 521 ,(2005) , 10.1080/14992020500190003
Marre W. Kaandorp, Cas Smits, Paul Merkus, S. Theo Goverts, Joost M. Festen, Assessing speech recognition abilities with digits in noise in cochlear implant and hearing aid users International Journal of Audiology. ,vol. 54, pp. 48- 57 ,(2015) , 10.3109/14992027.2014.945623
Adrian Davis, Mark Haggard, Ian Bell, Magnitude of diotic summation in speech-in-noise tasks: performance region and appropriate baseline. British Journal of Audiology. ,vol. 24, pp. 11- 16 ,(1990) , 10.3109/03005369009077838
Kostas Kokkinakis, Natalie Pak, Binaural advantages in users of bimodal and bilateral cochlear implant devices Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. ,vol. 135, ,(2014) , 10.1121/1.4831955
Joshua G. W. Bernstein, Ken W. Grant, Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. ,vol. 125, pp. 3358- 3372 ,(2009) , 10.1121/1.3110132
Richard J. M. van Hoesel, Richard S. Tyler, Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. ,vol. 113, pp. 1617- 1630 ,(2003) , 10.1121/1.1539520
Joseph G. Desloge, Charlotte M. Reed, Louis D. Braida, Zachary D. Perez, Lorraine A. Delhorne, Speech reception by listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment: effects of continuous and interrupted noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. ,vol. 128, pp. 342- 359 ,(2010) , 10.1121/1.3436522
Helen E. Cullington, Fan-Gang Zeng, Speech recognition with varying numbers and types of competing talkers by normal-hearing, cochlear-implant, and implant simulation subjects. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. ,vol. 123, pp. 450- 461 ,(2008) , 10.1121/1.2805617