WTO Judicial Politics and EU Trade Policy: Business Associations as Vessels of Special Interest?

作者: Arlo Poletti , Dirk De Bièvre , Marcel Hanegraaff

DOI: 10.1111/1467-856X.12071

关键词:

摘要: This article focuses on the effects of WTO’s quasi-judicial system dispute resolution politics trade policy making in European Union (EU). We argue that this institutional innovation had a systematic transformative effect EU politics, creating pressures for adaptation and changing character organized lobbying. On one hand, new environment WTO created to implement significant innovations ease access private parties generate an influx information strengthen offensive market actions. other reform directly affected firms’ incentives mobilize politically, specialized The empirical analysis shows how these two processes ultimately led re-organization lobbying compelled business associations become increasingly receptive demands special interests.

参考文章(56)
Marc L Busch, Eric Reinhardt, Eric Reinhardt, Transatlantic Trade Conflicts and GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement ,(2002)
Justin Greenwood, Inside the EU Business Associations ,(2002)
Christine Mahoney, Brussels Versus the Beltway: Advocacy in the United States and the European Union Georgetown University Press. ,(2008)
ALEC STONE SWEET, Judicialization and the Construction of Governance Comparative Political Studies. ,vol. 32, pp. 147- 184 ,(1999) , 10.1177/0010414099032002001
David Lowery, Virginia Gray, How some rules just don't matter: The regulation of lobbyists Public Choice. ,vol. 91, pp. 139- 147 ,(1997) , 10.1023/A:1017909514423
Kimberly Ann Elliott, Amelia Porges, Charles Iceland, Thomas O. Bayard, Reciprocity and Retaliation in U.S. Trade Policy ,(1994)
Stephen Woolcock, The Treaty of Lisbon and the European Union as an actor in international trade Brussels: European Centre for International Political Economy (ECIPE). ,(2010)