Can the vaccine adverse event reporting system be used to increase vaccine acceptance and trust

作者: Laura D. Scherer , Victoria A. Shaffer , Niraj Patel , Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher

DOI: 10.1016/J.VACCINE.2016.03.087

关键词:

摘要: Vaccine refusal has an impact on public health, and the human pappillomavirus (HPV) vaccine is particularly underutilized. Research suggests that it may be difficult to change vaccine-related attitudes, there currently no good evidence recommend any particular intervention strategy. One reason for hesitancy lack of trust harms are adequately documented reported, yet few communication strategies have explicitly attempted improve this trust. This study tested possibility data from adverse event reporting system (VAERS) can used increase researched potential disclosed public, thereby perceptions vaccines. In study, participants were randomly assigned one three interventions. All read Centers Disease Control (CDC) information statement (VIS) HPV vaccine. Two other groups exposed additional about VAERS, either summary or full detailed reports serious events 2013. Results showed CDC's VIS alone significantly increased benefits decreased perceived risks. Participants who also educated VAERS given displayed more in CDC greater acceptance relative alone. However, exposure reduced acceptance. Hence, general slightly improved acceptance, but specific negatively influenced both Implications communicating vaccines discussed.

参考文章(20)
Tom T. Shimabukuro, Michael Nguyen, David Martin, Frank DeStefano, Safety monitoring in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Vaccine. ,vol. 33, pp. 4398- 4405 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.VACCINE.2015.07.035
Susan S Ellenberg, John K Iskander, Penina Haber, Vitali Pool, Robert P Wise, Roseanne English-Bullard, Gina Mootrey, Robert P Pless, Weigong Zhou, Robert Ball, M Miles Braun, Robert T Chen, Surveillance for safety after immunization: Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)--United States, 1991-2001. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. ,vol. 52, pp. 1- 24 ,(2003)
Holly O. Witteman, Selma Chipenda Dansokho, Nicole Exe, Audrey Dupuis, Thierry Provencher, Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher, Risk Communication, Values Clarification, and Vaccination Decisions Risk Analysis. ,vol. 35, pp. 1801- 1819 ,(2015) , 10.1111/RISA.12418
Douglas J. Opel, Rita Mangione-Smith, James A. Taylor, Carolyn Korfiatis, Cheryl Wiese, Sheryl Catz, Diane P. Martin, Development of a survey to identify vaccine-hesitant parents Human Vaccines. ,vol. 7, pp. 419- 425 ,(2011) , 10.4161/HV.7.4.14120
Andrea L Benin, Daryl J Wisler-Scher, Eve Colson, Eugene D Shapiro, Eric S Holmboe, Qualitative Analysis of Mothers' Decision-Making About Vaccines for Infants: The Importance of Trust Pediatrics. ,vol. 117, pp. 1532- 1541 ,(2006) , 10.1542/PEDS.2005-1728
Edward Mills, Alejandro R. Jadad, Cory Ross, Kumanan Wilson, Systematic review of qualitative studies exploring parental beliefs and attitudes toward childhood vaccination identifies common barriers to vaccination Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. ,vol. 58, pp. 1081- 1088 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2005.09.002
Caitlin Jarrett, Rose Wilson, Maureen O’Leary, Elisabeth Eckersberger, Heidi J. Larson, Strategies for addressing vaccine hesitancy – A systematic review☆ Vaccine. ,vol. 33, pp. 4180- 4190 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.VACCINE.2015.04.040
Eve Dubé, Dominique Gagnon, Noni E MacDonald, None, Strategies intended to address vaccine hesitancy: Review of published reviews. Vaccine. ,vol. 33, pp. 4191- 4203 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.VACCINE.2015.04.041