Changes in rates of autopsy-detected diagnostic errors over time: a systematic review.

作者: Kaveh G. Shojania , Elizabeth C. Burton , Kathryn M. McDonald , Lee Goldman

DOI: 10.1001/JAMA.289.21.2849

关键词:

摘要: ContextSubstantial discrepanies exist between clinical diagnoses and findings at autopsy. Autopsy may be used as a tool for quality management to analyze diagnostic discrepanies.ObjectiveTo determine the rate at which autopsies detect important, clinically missed diagnoses, extent this has changed over time.Data SourcesA systematic literature search English-language articles available on MEDLINE from 1966 April 2002, using terms autopsy, postmortem changes, post-mortem, postmortem, necropsy, posthumous, identified 45 studies reporting 53 distinct autopsy series meeting prospectively defined criteria. Reference lists were reviewed identify additional studies, final bibliography was distributed experts in field missing or unpublished studies.Study SelectionIncluded studies reported clinically missed involving primary cause of death (major errors), with most serious being those likely to have affected patient outcome (class I errors).Data ExtractionLogistic regression performed data autopsy series 40-year period adjusting effects changes autopsy rates, country, case mix (general autopsies; adult medical; intensive care; or pediatric surgery; general pediatrics inpatients; neonatal intensive care; other autopsy), important methodological features primary studies.Data SynthesisOf identified, 42 major errors 37 reported class errors. Twenty-six both class I error rates. The median error 23.5% (range, 4.1%-49.8%) major errors 9.0% 0%-20.7%) Analyses diagnostic error rates mix, rate yielded relative decreases per decade 19.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8%-33.8%) 33.4% [CI], 8.4%-51.6%) I errors. Despite these decreases, we estimated that contemporary US institution (based on ranging 100% [the extrapolated extreme which clinical selection is eliminated] 5% [roughly national average]), could observe 8.4% 24.4% from 4.1% 6.7%.ConclusionThe possibility given will reveal unsuspected diagnoses decreased time, but remains sufficiently high encouraging ongoing use appears warranted.

参考文章(76)
Eric H. Bernicker, Robert L. Atmar, David L. Schaffner, Stephen B. Greenberg, Unanticipated Diagnoses Found at Autopsy in an Urban Public Teaching Hospital The American Journal of the Medical Sciences. ,vol. 311, pp. 215- 220 ,(1996) , 10.1097/00000441-199605000-00004
Brahm Goldstein, Leon Metlay, Christopher Cox, Jeffrey S. Rubenstein, Association of pre mortem diagnosis and autopsy findings in pediatric intensive care unit versus emergency department versus ward patients. Critical Care Medicine. ,vol. 24, pp. 683- 686 ,(1996) , 10.1097/00003246-199604000-00022
Steven J. Twigg, Alastair McCrirrick, Peter M. Sanderson, A comparison of post mortem findings with post hoc estimated clinical diagnoses of patients who die in a United Kingdom intensive care unit. Intensive Care Medicine. ,vol. 27, pp. 706- 710 ,(2001) , 10.1007/S001340100903
Lee Goldman, Robert Sayson, Stanley Robbins, Lawrence H. Cohn, Michael Bettmann, Monica Weisberg, The Value of the Autopsy in Three Medical Eras New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 308, pp. 1000- 1005 ,(1983) , 10.1056/NEJM198304283081704
Tobias Kircher, Judith Nelson, Harold Burdo, The autopsy as a measure of accuracy of the death certificate. The New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 313, pp. 1263- 1269 ,(1985) , 10.1056/NEJM198511143132005
A Thornton, Publication bias in meta-analysis: its causes and consequences Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. ,vol. 53, pp. 207- 216 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00161-4
Clement J McDonald, Michael Weiner, Siu L Hui, Deaths Due to Medical Errors Are Exaggerated in Institute of Medicine Report JAMA. ,vol. 284, pp. 93- 95 ,(2000) , 10.1001/JAMA.284.1.93
Judith C. Ahronheim, Age Trends in Autopsy Rates JAMA. ,vol. 250, pp. 1182- 1186 ,(1983) , 10.1001/JAMA.1983.03340090038026
Venetia Rumnong Sarode, B.N. Datta, A.K. Banerjee, C.K. Banerjee, Kusum Joshi, B. Bhusnurmath, B.D. Radotra, Autopsy findings and clinical diagnoses: A review of 1,000 cases Human Pathology. ,vol. 24, pp. 194- 198 ,(1993) , 10.1016/0046-8177(93)90300-6