Clinical application of bone conduction audiometry.

作者: R. CARHART

DOI: 10.1001/ARCHOTOL.1950.00700020824003

关键词:

摘要: MANY otolaryngologists distrust bone conduction audiometry. Attempts to use it as a diagnostic tool in clinical practice have frequently been unsatisfactory and discouraging. It is true that some otologists come rely on the technic, but they encountered difficulty when comparing results. Generally speaking, audiometry considered relatively uncertain method which serves merely supplement tuning fork tests. DIFFICULTIES IN BONE CONDUCTION TESTING Four major reasons contribute current mistrust of measurements. In first place, many workers doubt reliability thresholds obtained by this method. They feel high margin error introduced such factors differences positioning vibrator pressure with applied. However, Carhart Hayes shown can good repeatability circumstances.1They compared tests 500 ears.

参考文章(4)
Raymond Carhart, Claude Hayes, Clinical reliability of bone conduction audiometry Laryngoscope. ,vol. 59, pp. 1084- 1101 ,(1949) , 10.1002/LARY.5540591003
Henrik Johansen, Relation of Audiograms to the Impedance Formula Acta Oto-laryngologica. ,vol. 36, pp. 65- 75 ,(1948) , 10.3109/00016484809131988
Arthur L. Juers, Observations on bone conduction in fenestration cases; physiological considerations. Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology. ,vol. 57, pp. 28- 40 ,(1948) , 10.1177/000348944805700102