Global Governance for Health: how to motivate political change?

摘要: Abstract In this article, we address a central theme that was discussed at the Durham Health Summit: how can politics be brought back into global health governance and figure much more prominently in discussions around policy? We begin by briefly summarizing report of Lancet – University Oslo Commission on Global Governance for Health: ‘The Political Origins Inequity’ Ottersen et al. order to provide compelling evidence argument, selected seven case studies relating to, inter alia , economic fiscal policy, food security, foreign trade investment agreements. Based an analysis these studies, concludes problems identified are often due political choices: unwillingness change system governance. This raises question: what is most effective way kind used motivate policy-makers, public large, demand change? What moral or rational argument likely lead action? paper assess merits various alternative perspectives: as investment; good; human security; development; right; justice. conclude required explicitly perspective favouring later rather than earlier alternatives just listed.