Assessing Effects of Unreplicated Perturbations: No Simple Solutions

作者: Allan Stewart-Oaten , James R. Bence , Craig W. Osenberg

DOI: 10.2307/1940685

关键词:

摘要: We address the task of determining effects, on mean population density or other parameters, an unreplicated perturbation, such as arises in environmental assessments and some ecosystem-level experiments. Our context is Before-After-Con- trol-Impact-Pairs design (BACIP): several dates Before After samples are collected simultaneously at both Impact site a nearby "Control." One approach to test whether Impact-Control difference has changed from perturbation. If conventional used, checks its as- sumptions important messy part analysis, since BACIP data do not necessarily satisfy them. It been suggested that these needed for ran- domization tests, because they insensitive assumptions can be adjusted allow others. A major aim this paper refute suggestion: there no panacea difficult technical problems analysis compare randomization t with standard modified (Welch- Satterthwaite-Aspin) test, which allows unequal variances. conclude less likely yield valid inferences than Welch it requires identical distributions small sample sizes either equal variances larger ones. The formal requirement Normality crucial test. Both parametric tests require time location effects additive differences different independent. These should tested; if seriously wrong, alternative analyses needed. This will often long series data. Finally, assessing importance P value hypothesis rarely useful estimate size effect. Especially effect varies conditions, flexible estimation methods approximate answers preferable formally exact values.

参考文章(44)
G. G. Mittelbach, C. W. Osenberg, M. A. Leibold, Trophic Relations and Ontogenetic Niche Shifts in Aquatic Ecosystems Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. pp. 219- 235 ,(1988) , 10.1007/978-3-642-74001-5_15
D. J. Gans, Use of a preliminary test in comparing two sample means Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation. ,vol. 10, pp. 163- 174 ,(1981) , 10.1080/03610918108812201
B. P. Murphy, Comparison of some two sample means tests by simulation Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation. ,vol. 5, pp. 23- 32 ,(1976) , 10.1080/03610917608812004
M.L. Tiku, Robustness of MML estimators based on censored samples and robust test statistics Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference. ,vol. 4, pp. 123- 143 ,(1980) , 10.1016/0378-3758(80)90002-6
Richard Hay, Richard McCleary, David McDowall, Errol Meidinger, Interrupted Time Series Analysis ,(1980)
Wassily Hoeffding, The Large-Sample Power of Tests Based on Permutations of Observations Annals of Mathematical Statistics. ,vol. 23, pp. 169- 192 ,(1952) , 10.1214/AOMS/1177729436
Stephen M. Stigler, The Effect of Sample Heterogeneity on Linear Functions of Order Statistics, with Applications to Robust Estimation Journal of the American Statistical Association. ,vol. 71, pp. 956- 960 ,(1976) , 10.1080/01621459.1976.10480976
G. E. P. Box, G. C. Tiao, Intervention Analysis with Applications to Economic and Environmental Problems Journal of the American Statistical Association. ,vol. 70, pp. 70- 79 ,(1975) , 10.1080/01621459.1975.10480264
James O. Berger, Thomas Sellke, Testing a Point Null Hypothesis: The Irreconcilability of P Values and Evidence Journal of the American Statistical Association. ,vol. 82, pp. 112- 122 ,(1987) , 10.1080/01621459.1987.10478397
Noel A Cressie, Playing safe with misweighted means Journal of the American Statistical Association. ,vol. 77, pp. 754- 759 ,(1982) , 10.2307/2287302