摘要: Several years ago Professor Robert Dahl argued that the traditional concern over Supreme Court's power of judicial review was largely unfounded. demonstrated seldom, if ever, had Court been successful in blocking will a law-making majority. This paper argues that, considered his data from different perspective, he would have discovered by virtue recruitment process, rarely even attempt to thwart Examining Dahl's context Survey Research Center's election classification scheme, focuses on relation patterns partisan change show philosophic with counter-majoritarian nature is divorced empirical reality and has relevance only during periods realignment within political system as whole. The buttresses argument “yea-saying” more important than its “nay-saying” power, realization which can serve premise logically consistent justification may be dialectically constructed.
sci-hub.se 参考文章(83)
Robert J. Steamer, The Supreme Court in crisis : a history of conflict University of Massachusetts Press. ,(1971)
Robert Alan Dahl, Pluralist Democracy in the United States: Conflict and Consent ,(1967)
William E. Connolly, The bias of pluralism ,(1969)
Robert G. Scigliano, The Supreme Court and the Presidency ,(1971)
Dwight Lowell Dumond, Antislavery Origins of the Civil War in the United States ,(1961)
Richard Funston, Judicial crises;: The Supreme Court in a changing America ,(1974)
Leonard Williams Levy, Judicial review and the Supreme Court : selected essays Harper & Row. ,(1967)
Leonard Williams Levy, American constitutional law : historical essays Harper and Row. ,(1966)
Philip B. Kurland, Politics, the Constitution, and the Warren Court ,(1970)
W. G. Andrews, American Voting Participation Political Research Quarterly. ,vol. 19, pp. 639- 652 ,(1966) , 10.1177/106591296601900403