Innovation, Market Structure, and Firm Size
作者： Zoltan J. Acs , David B. Audretsch
DOI: 10.2307/1935950
关键词:
摘要: The hypothesis that the relative innovative advantage between large and small firms is determined by market concentration, the extent of entry barriers, the composition of firm size …
jstor.org
sci-hub.se 参考文章(11)
Morton I Kamien, Nancy L Schwartz, None, Market Structure and Innovation: A Survey Journal of Economic Literature. ,vol. 13, pp. 1- 37 ,(2016)
William G. Shepherd, The economics of industrial organization ,(1979)
Albert N. Link, Firm Size and Efficient Entrepreneurial Activity: A Reformulation of the Schumpeter Hypothesis. Journal of Political Economy. ,vol. 88, pp. 771- 782 ,(1980) , 10.1086/260901
Zoltan J. Acs, David B. Audretsch, Innovation in large and small firms Economics Letters. ,vol. 23, pp. 109- 112 ,(1987) , 10.1016/0165-1765(87)90211-4
Barry T. Hirsch, Albert N. Link, Labor union effects on innovative activity Journal of Labor Research. ,vol. 8, pp. 323- 332 ,(1987) , 10.1007/BF02685217
Barry T. Hirsch, John T. Addison, The Economic Analysis of Unions: New Approaches and Evidence ,(1986)
Raymond Vernon, International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle The Quarterly Journal of Economics. ,vol. 80, pp. 190- 207 ,(1966) , 10.2307/1880689
Michael E. Porter, Interbrand Choice, Strategy, and Bilateral Market Power ,(1976)
Robert A. Connolly, Barry T. Hirsch, Mark Hirschey, Union Rent Seeking, Intangible Capital, and Market Value of the Firm The Review of Economics and Statistics. ,vol. 68, pp. 567- 577 ,(1986) , 10.2307/1924515
P. S. Natarajan, The Conditions for Success in Technological Innovation The Indian journal of nutrition and dietetics. ,vol. 10, pp. 103- 104 ,(1973)