Personality, Executive Control, and Neurobiological Characteristics Associated with Different Forms of Risky Driving

作者: Thomas G. Brown , Marie Claude Ouimet , Manal Eldeb , Jacques Tremblay , Evelyn Vingilis

DOI: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0150227

关键词:

摘要: BACKGROUND: Road crashes represent a huge burden on global health. Some drivers are prone to repeated episodes of risky driving (RD) and over-represented in related morbidity. However, their characteristics heterogeneous, hampering development targeted intervention strategies. This study hypothesized that distinct personality, cognitive, neurobiological processes associated with the type RD behaviours these predominantly engage in. METHODS: Four age-matched groups adult (19-39 years) males were recruited: 1) while impaired recidivists (DWI, n = 36); 2) non-alcohol reckless (SPEED, 28); 3) mixed profile (MIXED, 27); 4) low-risk control (CTL, 47). Their sociodemographic, criminal history, behaviour (by questionnaire simulation performance), personality (Big Five traits, impulsivity, reward sensitivity), cognitive (disinhibition, decision making, behavioural risk taking), (cortisol stress response) gathered contrasted. RESULTS: Compared controls, group SPEED showed greater sensation seeking, disinhibition, disadvantageous taking. Group MIXED exhibited more substance misuse, antisocial, seeking sensitive features. DWI disinhibition severe alcohol compared other groups, lowest level taking when sober. All less cortisol increase response controls. DISCUSSION: Each profile, which was consistent stimulation SPEED, fearlessness MIXED, poor regulation DWI. As differences uniformly accompanied by blunted responses, they may reflect disparate consequences dysregulation system. In sum, preference appears be useful marker for clarifying explanatory pathways driving, research into developing personalized prevention efforts. Language: en

参考文章(96)
William R. Lovallo, Individual Differences in Response to Stress and Risk for Addiction Stress and Addiction#R##N#Biological and Psychological Mechanism. pp. 227- 248 ,(2007) , 10.1016/B978-012370632-4/50014-0
Aviel Goodman, Neurobiology of addiction Biochemical Pharmacology. ,vol. 75, pp. 266- 322 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.BCP.2007.07.030
Bruce G Simons-Morton, Marie Claude Ouimet, Donald L Fisher, Caitlin W Duffy, Thomas G Brown, Understanding and Changing the Younger Driver Problem: A Review of the Randomized Controlled Trials Conducted with Driving Simulation ,(2011)
Richard Jessor, Risky driving and adolescent problem behavior: an extension of problem behavior theory Alcohol, drugs and driving. ,vol. 3, pp. 1- 11 ,(1987)
Muzaffer Kasar, Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht, Cahit Keskinkilic, Abdulkadir Tabo, Facundo F. Manes, Decision‐Making in People Who Relapsed to Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. ,vol. 34, pp. 2162- 2168 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1530-0277.2010.01313.X
John C Higgins-Biddle, Thomas Babor, John B Saunders, Maristela G Monteiro, AUDIT - The alcohol use disorders identification test: guidelines for use in primary care. World Health Organizaton Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse. ,(2001)
Antoine Bechara, Risky business: emotion, decision-making, and addiction. Journal of Gambling Studies. ,vol. 19, pp. 23- 51 ,(2003) , 10.1023/A:1021223113233
Thomas G. Brown, Marie Claude Ouimet, Treatments for Alcohol‐Related Impaired Driving Alcohol-Related Violence: Prevention and Treatment. pp. 303- 334 ,(2012) , 10.1002/9781118411094.CH15
Eleni Petridou, Maria Moustaki, Human factors in the causation of road traffic crashes European Journal of Epidemiology. ,vol. 16, pp. 819- 826 ,(2000) , 10.1023/A:1007649804201
A. Bechara, H. Damasio, D. Tranel, A.R. Damasio, The Iowa Gambling Task and the somatic marker hypothesis: some questions and answers. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. ,vol. 9, pp. 159- 162 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.TICS.2005.02.002