摘要: Abstract This article looks at the ideological view of writing in L1 composition and attempts to answer question why a similar has not been propounded ESL writing. The claim is that difference can be attributed to: 1) different affiliations L2 composition, is, with literature applied linguistics, 2) scientific model for research, 3) ESL's primarily pragmatic aims, 4) conservatizing effect EFL. concludes by considering whether might move direction developing perspective.
elsevier.com
sci-hub.se 参考文章(52)
Ann M. Johns, Second Language Writing: L1 composition theories: implications for developing theories of L2 composition Cambridge University Press. pp. 24- 36 ,(1990) , 10.1017/CBO9781139524551.006
James Berlin, Rhetoric and Ideology in the Writing Class. College English. ,vol. 50, pp. 477- ,(1988) , 10.2307/377477
Lester Faigley, Competing Theories of Process: A Critique and a Proposal. College English. ,vol. 48, pp. 527- ,(1986) , 10.2307/376707
James Moffett, Writing, Inner Speech, and Meditation College English. ,vol. 44, pp. 231- ,(1982) , 10.2307/377011
Patricia Bizzell, Arguing about Literacy College English. ,vol. 50, pp. 141- ,(1988) , 10.2307/377639
Kenneth A. Bruffee, Social Construction, Language, and the Authority of Knowledge: A Bibliographical Essay. College English. ,vol. 48, pp. 773- ,(1986) , 10.2307/376723
Harvey S. Wiener, Collaborative Learning in the Classroom: A Guide to Evaluation. College English. ,vol. 48, pp. 52- 61 ,(1986) , 10.2307/376586
John Rouse, The Politics of Composition. College English. ,vol. 41, pp. 1- 12 ,(1979) , 10.2307/376355
Andrea A. Lunsford, Composing Ourselves: Politics, Commitment, and the Teaching of Writing. College Composition and Communication. ,vol. 41, pp. 71- 82 ,(1990) , 10.2307/357884
Eleanor Kutz, Between Students' Language and Academic Discourse: Interlanguage as Middle Ground. College English. ,vol. 48, pp. 385- ,(1986) , 10.2307/377266