Immunotoxicity testing using human primary leukocytes: An adjunct approach for the evaluation of human risk.

作者: Ashwini S. Phadnis-Moghe , Norbert E. Kaminski

DOI: 10.1016/J.COTOX.2017.04.005

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Historically, immunotoxicity testing for chemicals, pesticides and pharmaceuticals has relied heavily on animal models to identify effects the immune system followed by extrapolation humans. Substantial progress been made in past decade understanding human cell regulation, adaptive innate responses its modulation. The is complex there exists diversity within composition, localization, activation of different types between individuals. inherent variation populations owing genetics environment can have a significant influence response infectious agents, drugs, chemicals other environmental factors. Several recent reports highlighted that mouse sepsis inflammation are poorly predictive disease physiology pathology. Rodent cells differ expression surface proteins phenotypes expressed models, which may significantly mechanism action xenobiotics susceptibility yielding profile activity across species. In light these differences trends toward precision medicine, personalized therapies 3Rs (reduce, replace refine use) approaches, importance using ‘all human’ model systems cannot be overstated. Hence, this opinion piece aims discuss new used assess contaminants modulators cells, advantages challenges primary immunotoxicology research implication future testing.

参考文章(15)
Rachael E. Hawtin, Alessandra Cesano, Immune monitoring technology primer: Single Cell Network Profiling (SCNP). Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer. ,vol. 3, pp. 34- 34 ,(2015) , 10.1186/S40425-015-0075-Z
Mark M. Davis, A prescription for human immunology Immunity. ,vol. 29, pp. 835- 838 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.IMMUNI.2008.12.003
Ashwini S. Phadnis-Moghe, Robert B. Crawford, Norbert E. Kaminski, Suppression of Human B Cell Activation by 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin Involves Altered Regulation of B Cell Lymphoma-6 Toxicological Sciences. ,vol. 144, pp. 39- 50 ,(2015) , 10.1093/TOXSCI/KFU257
S. C. Bendall, E. F. Simonds, P. Qiu, E.-a. D. Amir, P. O. Krutzik, R. Finck, R. V. Bruggner, R. Melamed, A. Trejo, O. I. Ornatsky, R. S. Balderas, S. K. Plevritis, K. Sachs, D. Pe'er, S. D. Tanner, G. P. Nolan, Single-cell mass cytometry of differential immune and drug responses across a human hematopoietic continuum. Science. ,vol. 332, pp. 687- 696 ,(2011) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.1198704
Tal Shay, Vladimir Jojic, Or Zuk, Katherine Rothamel, David Puyraimond-Zemmour, Ting Feng, Ei Wakamatsu, Christophe Benoist, Daphne Koller, Aviv Regev, ImmGen Consortium, None, Conservation and divergence in the transcriptional programs of the human and mouse immune systems Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. ,vol. 110, pp. 2946- 2951 ,(2013) , 10.1073/PNAS.1222738110
H Tryphonas, Approaches to detecting immunotoxic effects of environmental contaminants in humans. Environmental Health Perspectives. ,vol. 109, pp. 877- 884 ,(2001) , 10.1289/EHP.01109S6877
Thitirat Ngaotepprutaram, Barbara L.F. Kaplan, Norbert E. Kaminski, Impaired NFAT and NFκB Activation are Involved in Suppression of CD40 Ligand Expression by Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol in Human CD4+ T cells Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. ,vol. 273, pp. 209- 218 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.TAAP.2013.08.023
Javier Mestas, Christopher C. W. Hughes, Of mice and not men: differences between mouse and human immunology Journal of Immunology. ,vol. 172, pp. 2731- 2738 ,(2004) , 10.4049/JIMMUNOL.172.5.2731