The Einstein—Podolsky—Rosen Paradox

作者: Franco Selleri

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-1862-7_5

关键词:

摘要: Given two small objects, the first located on earth, second a distance of one light year away, consider for moment your reaction to following assertion: “No large modification properties object earth can take place as consequence distant interacting with third body.” This statement claims in fact that measurable physical quantity should have value more than 40% different from its predicted by quantum mechanics. The conclusion is paradoxical, if we define ‘paradox’ consist an argument deriving contradictory conclusions valid deduction acceptable premises.

参考文章(71)
Nihon Gakujutsu Kaigi, Hajime Narumi, I. Shimamura, Nihon Butsuri Gakkai, Nihon Sūgaku Butsuri Gakkai, Abstracts : Tenth International Conference on Atomic Physics, Tokyo, August 25-29, 1986 s.n.. ,(1986)
H. P. Stapp, Are superluminal connections necessary Il Nuovo Cimento B. ,vol. 40, pp. 191- 205 ,(1977) , 10.1007/BF02739191
J.C. Duder, M. Sosnowski, D. Melnik, Comparison of predictions for Physics Letters B. ,vol. 85, pp. 206- 208 ,(1979) , 10.1016/0370-2693(79)90579-3
P. H. Eberhard, Bell’s theorem and the different concepts of locality Il Nuovo Cimento B. ,vol. 46, pp. 392- 419 ,(1978) , 10.1007/BF02728628
Arthur E. Ruark, Is the Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Complete? Physical Review. ,vol. 48, pp. 466- 467 ,(1935) , 10.1103/PHYSREV.48.466.2
T.W. Marshall, E. Santos, F. Selleri, Local realism has not been refuted by atomic cascade experiments Physics Letters A. ,vol. 98, pp. 5- 9 ,(1983) , 10.1016/0375-9601(83)90531-5
C. A. Hooker, Concerning Einstein's, Podolsky's, and Rosen's Objection to Quantum Theory American Journal of Physics. ,vol. 38, pp. 851- 857 ,(1970) , 10.1119/1.1976483
Francis M. Pipkin, Atomic Physics Tests of the Basic Concepts in Quantum Mechanics Advances in atomic and molecular physics. ,vol. 14, pp. 281- 340 ,(1979) , 10.1016/S0065-2199(08)60130-X