When do parties emphasise extreme positions? How strategic incentives for policy differentiation influence issue importance

作者: MARKUS WAGNER

DOI: 10.1111/J.1475-6765.2011.01989.X

关键词:

摘要: Parties have an incentive to take up extreme positions in order achieve policy differentiation and issue ownership, it would make sense for a party stress these as well. These incentives are not the same all issues parties but may be modified by other strategic conditions: size, system positional distinctiveness systemic salience. Using manifesto-based measures of salience expert assessments positions, findings this article that emphasise if, first, they relatively small terms vote share; second, position is distinctive from those parties; third, fail issue. consequences our understanding strategies, competition radicalisation political debates.

参考文章(57)
Peter Mair, Left–Right Orientations Oxford Handbooks Online. ,(2007) , 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199270125.003.0011
Hanspeter Kriesi, Simon Bornschier, Romain Lachat, Timotheos Frey, Edgar Grande, Martin Dolezal, West European Politics in the Age of Globalization ,(2008)
Marco R. Steenbergen, David J. Scott, Contesting Europe? The salience of European integration as a party issue European Integration and Political Conflict. pp. 165- 192 ,(2004) , 10.1017/CBO9780511492013.010
Peter Mair, The West European party system Oxford University Press. ,(1990)
Ian Budge, Judith Bara, Andrea Volkens, Eric Tanenbaum, Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945-1998 ,(2001)