The Ten-Year Rule: Allocation of Emission Allowances in the EU Emission Trading System

作者: Lars Zetterberg , Markus Åhman , Joseph Kruger , Dallas Burtraw

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: In its guidance on National Allocation Plans (NAPs), the European Commission has discouraged Member States from adopting allocation methodologies that would provide incentives to firms affecting their compliance behavior. The purpose is promote economic efficiency and prevent strategic behavior deviates individual collective cost-minimization. For example, some reward one type of investment over another. To discourage such actions, EU Emission Trading System guidelines prohibit ex post redistribution emission allowances within an period based in period. Similarly, indicated decisions about initial distribution second phase (2008-2012) must depend measures prior 2005 so as not give companies incentive adjust receive a larger allowance allocation. However, two other aspects NAPs—the treatment closures new entrants—may also affect firm An undercurrent these question whether should allow incumbent emitters hold infinitely lived, once-and-for-all property rights share future. This paper develops approach for balancing considerations with perceived issues fairness. We propose ten-year rule guide policy regarding closure existing sources status general. A address fairness capture important part potential gains could be achieved through efficient allowances.

参考文章(19)
A. Denny Ellerman, US experience with emissions trading: lessons for CO2 emissions trading Emissions Trading for Climate Policy. pp. 78- 95 ,(2005) , 10.1017/CBO9780511493485.007
A. Lans Bovenberg, Lawrence Goulder, Neutralizing the Adverse Industry Impacts of CO2 Abatement Policies: What Does It Cost? Social Science Research Network. pp. 45- 90 ,(2000) , 10.3386/W7654
Robert N. Stavins, Vintage-Differentiated Environmental Regulation Social Science Research Network. ,(2005) , 10.2139/SSRN.848326
Terry M. Dinan, Diane Lim Rogers, Distributional Effects of Carbon Allowance Trading: How Government Decisions Determine Winners and Losers National Tax Journal. ,vol. 55, pp. 199- 221 ,(2002) , 10.17310/NTJ.2002.2.01
Joseph Kruger, William A Pizer, The EU Emissions Trading Directive: Opportunities and Potential Pitfalls Research Papers in Economics. ,(2004)
Peter Cramton, Suzi Kerr, Tradeable carbon permit auctions Energy Policy. ,vol. 30, pp. 333- 345 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00100-8
Robert N Stavins, What Can We Learn from the Grand Policy Experiment? Lessons from SO2 Allowance Trading Journal of Economic Perspectives. ,vol. 12, pp. 69- 88 ,(1998) , 10.1257/JEP.12.3.69