Physiological Study of Anal Sphincteric Resection in an Experimental Porcine Model

作者: YUICHIRO SATO , YASUMI ARAKI , YUTAKA OGATA , KAZUO SHIROUZU

DOI: 10.2739/KURUMEMEDJ.55.7

关键词:

摘要: This study was conducted to compare and evaluate the extent of anal sphincteric resection degree dysfunction in sphincter saving operations for lower rectal cancer using experimental porcine models. Each 10 Clawn miniature pigs underwent transanal intersphincteric (ISR), ISR with partial (one-quarter) external (ESR-25%), (one-half) (ESR-50%). An anorectal physiological performed before, one month, three months after surgery these groups. The maximum resting pressure (AMRP) decreased from 45.1 cmH 2 O control group 14.8, 14.3 11.1 month surgery, 15.2, 8.8 5.2 ISR, ESR-25% ESR-50% groups, respectively. squeezing (AMSP) 81.7 42.1, 40.1 41.1 Three MSP increased 78.1 68.1 respectively, but showed a significantly 39.2 compared other two ratio potential difference on electromyographic (EMG) 0.19 group, this value than 0.8 surgery. EMG almost preoperative level both redness, sore soiling around anus results indicate that models additional less quarter have little dysfunction. A human clinical trial is needed determine ESR very low cancer.

参考文章(16)
P. Rouanet, J. M. Fabre, J. B. Dubois, F. Dravet, B. Saint Aubert, J. Pradel, J. M. Ychou, C. Solassol, H. Pujol, Conservative Surgery for Low Rectal Carcinoma After High-Dose Radiation Functional and Oncologic Results Annals of Surgery. ,vol. 221, pp. 67- 73 ,(1995) , 10.1097/00000658-199501000-00008
Gloria Lacima, Miguel Pera, Josep Valls-Solé, Xavier González-Argenté, Montserrat Puig-Clota, Montserrat Espuña, Electrophysiologic Studies and Clinical Findings in Females With Combined Fecal and Urinary Incontinence: A Prospective Study Diseases of The Colon & Rectum. ,vol. 49, pp. 353- 359 ,(2006) , 10.1007/S10350-005-0277-4
Karl Renner, Harald R. Rosen, Gabriele Novi, Nikolaus Hölbling, Rudolf Schiessel, Quality of life after surgery for rectal cancer: do we still need a permanent colostomy? Diseases of The Colon & Rectum. ,vol. 42, pp. 1160- 1167 ,(1999) , 10.1007/BF02238568
Joseph Braun, Karl H. Treutner, Gerd Winkeltau, Ursula Heidenreich, Markus M. Lerch, Volker Schumpelick, Results of intersphincteric resection of the rectum with direct coloanal anastomosis for rectal carcinoma American Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 163, pp. 407- 412 ,(1992) , 10.1016/0002-9610(92)90042-P
Frédéric Bretagnol, Eric Rullier, Christophe Laurent, Frank Zerbib, Renaud Gontier, Jean Saric, Comparison of Functional Results and Quality of Life Between Intersphincteric Resection and Conventional Coloanal Anastomosis for Low Rectal Cancer Diseases of The Colon & Rectum. ,vol. 47, pp. 832- 838 ,(2004) , 10.1007/S10350-004-0523-1
Eric Rullier, Frank Zerbib, Christophe Laurent, Catherine Bonnel, Michel Caudry, Jean Saric, Michel Parneix, Intersphincteric resection with excision of internal anal sphincter for conservative treatment of very low rectal cancer. Diseases of The Colon & Rectum. ,vol. 42, pp. 1168- 1175 ,(1999) , 10.1007/BF02238569
R. Schiessel, J. Karner-Hanusch, F. Herbst, B. Teleky, M. Wunderlich, Intersphincteric resection for low rectal tumours. British Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 81, pp. 1376- 1378 ,(2005) , 10.1002/BJS.1800810944
Tatsuo Teramoto, Masahiko Watanabe, Masaki Kitajima, Per Anum intersphincteric rectal dissection with direct coloanal anastomosis for lower rectal cancer Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. ,vol. 40, pp. S43- S47 ,(1997) , 10.1007/BF02062019
Philippe Rouanet, Bernard Saint-Aubert, Claire Lemanski, Pierre Senesse, Sophie Gourgou, Francois Quenet, Marc Ychou, Andrew Kramar, JeanBernard Dubois, Restorative and nonrestorative surgery for low rectal cancer after high-dose radiation: long-term oncologic and functional results. Diseases of The Colon & Rectum. ,vol. 45, pp. 305- 313 ,(2002) , 10.1007/S10350-004-6172-6
Gerald Marks, Mohammed Mohiuddin, Luigi Masoni, Alberto Montori, High-Dose Preoperative Radiation Therapy as the Key to Extending Sphincter-Preservation Surgery for Cancer of the Distal Rectum Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America. ,vol. 1, pp. 71- 86 ,(1992) , 10.1016/S1055-3207(18)30624-0