Shear bond strength of metal-ceramic repair systems

作者: Juliana Gomes dos Santos , Renata Garcia Fonseca , Gelson Luis Adabo , Carlos Alberto dos Santos Cruz

DOI: 10.1016/J.PROSDENT.2006.07.002

关键词:

摘要: Statement of problem When clinical fractures the ceramic veneer on metal-ceramic prostheses can be repaired, need for remake may eliminated or postponed. Many different repair materials are available, and bond strength data necessary predicting success a given system. Purpose This study evaluated shear systems restorations applied metal porcelain. Material methods Fifty cylindrical specimens (9 × 3 mm) were fabricated in nickel-chromium alloy (Vera Bond II) 50 feldspathic porcelain (Noritake). Metal (M) (P) embedded polyvinyl chloride (PVC) ring received 1 following bonding resin composite (n=10): Clearfil SE Bond/Clearfil AP-X (CL), Bistite II DC/Palfique (BT), CoJet Sand/Z100 (CJ), Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus/Z100 (SB) (control group), Sand plus (CJSB). The stored distilled water 24 hours at 37°C, thermal cycled (1000 cycles 5°C to 55°C), 37°C 8 days. Shear tests between performed mechanical testing machine with crosshead speed 0.5 mm/min. Mean values (MPa) submitted 1-way ANOVA Tukey honestly significant difference (α=.05). Each specimen was examined under stereoscopic lens ×30 magnification, mode failure classified as adhesive, cohesive, combination. Results On metal, mean groups follows: MCL, 18.40 ± 2.88 b ; MBT, 8.57 1.00 d MCJ, 25.24 3.46 MSB, 16.26 3.09 bc MCJSB, 13.11 1.24 c . porcelain, each group PCL, 16.91 2.22 PBT, 18.04 3.23 ab PCJ, 19.54 3.77 PSB, 21.05 3.22 PCJSB, 16.18 1.71 Within substrate, identical superscript letters denote no differences among groups. Conclusions substrate significantly higher using CJ For SB, CJ, BT showed highest values, only SB compared CL CJSB ( P

参考文章(51)
Lawson C, Knight Js, Bradford H, Holmes, Shear bond strengths of composite bonded to porcelain using porcelain repair systems. American Journal of Dentistry. ,vol. 16, pp. 252- ,(2003)
Wistrom Dw, Swift Ej, Diaz-Arnold Am, Aquilino Sa, Bond strengths of porcelain repair adhesive systems. American Journal of Dentistry. ,vol. 6, pp. 291- 294 ,(1993)
W W Barkmeier, M A Latta, Approaches for intraoral repair of ceramic restorations. Compendium of continuing education in dentistry. ,vol. 21, pp. 635- 646 ,(2000)
J A Sorensen, T J Torres, S P Avera, M J Engelman, Shear bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. International Journal of Prosthodontics. ,vol. 4, pp. 17- 23 ,(1991)
M R Bouschlicher, D S Cobb, M A Vargas, T A Fridrich, Metal surface treatment: characterization and effect on composite-to-metal bond strength. Operative Dentistry. ,vol. 25, pp. 427- 433 ,(2000)
Atsuta M, Matsumura H, Chen Jh, Effect of etchant, etching period, and silane priming on bond strength to porcelain of composite resin. Operative Dentistry. ,vol. 23, pp. 250- ,(1998)
Mutlu Ozcan, Wilhelm Niedermeier, Clinical study on the reasons for and location of failures of metal-ceramic restorations and survival of repairs. International Journal of Prosthodontics. ,vol. 15, pp. 299- 302 ,(2002)
A.M. Diaz-Arnold, R.L. Schneider, S.A. Aquilino, Bond strengths of intraoral porcelain repair materials. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. ,vol. 61, pp. 305- 309 ,(1989) , 10.1016/0022-3913(89)90133-9
R. Sun, N. Suansuwan, N. Kilpatrick, M. Swain, Characterisation of tribochemically assisted bonding of composite resin to porcelain and metal Journal of Dentistry. ,vol. 28, pp. 441- 445 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00006-3
D.M. Wolf, J.M. Powers, K.L. O'Keefe, Bond strength of composite to porcelain treated with new porcelain repair agents Dental Materials. ,vol. 8, pp. 158- 161 ,(1992) , 10.1016/0109-5641(92)90074-M