Characterizing the effect of matching using linear propensity score methods with normal distributions

作者: DONALD B. RUBIN , NEAL THOMAS

DOI: 10.1093/BIOMET/79.4.797

关键词:

摘要: SUMMARY Matched sampling is a standard technique for controlling bias in observational studies due to specific covariates. Since Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983), multivariate matching methods based on estimated propensity scores have been used with increasing frequency medical, educational, and sociological applications. We obtain analytic expressions the effect of using linear score normal distributions. These cover cases where either known, or discriminant analysis logistic regression, as typically done current practice. The results show that not only reduces along population score, but also controls variation components orthogonal it. Matching rather than can therefore lead relatively large variance reduction, much factor two common settings close matches are possible. Approximations given magnitude this which be computed estimates obtained from pools. Related reduction presented suggest that, difficult situations, use leads greater scores.

参考文章(17)
William G. Cochran, Donald B. Rubin, Controlling Bias in Observational Studies: A Review Matched Sampling for Causal Effects. pp. 30- 58 ,(1974) , 10.1017/CBO9780511810725.005
Donald B. Rubin, Neal Thomas, Affinely Invariant Matching Methods with Ellipsoidal Distributions Annals of Statistics. ,vol. 20, pp. 1079- 1093 ,(1992) , 10.1214/AOS/1176348671
Donald B. Rubin, Using Multivariate Matched Sampling and Regression Adjustment to Control Bias in Observational Studies Journal of the American Statistical Association. ,vol. 74, pp. 318- 328 ,(1979) , 10.1080/01621459.1979.10482513
T. Ashikaga, P. C. Chang, Robustness of Fisher's Linear Discriminant Function under Two-Component Mixed Normal Models Journal of the American Statistical Association. ,vol. 76, pp. 676- 680 ,(1981) , 10.1080/01621459.1981.10477703
Donald B. Rubin, The Use of Matched Sampling and Regression Adjustment to Remove Bias in Observational Studies Matched Sampling for Causal Effects. ,vol. 29, pp. 81- 98 ,(1973) , 10.1017/CBO9780511810725.008
R. G. CARPENTER, Matching when covariables are normally distributed Biometrika. ,vol. 64, pp. 299- 307 ,(1977) , 10.1093/BIOMET/64.2.299
Paul R. Rosenbaum, Model-Based Direct Adjustment Journal of the American Statistical Association. ,vol. 82, pp. 387- 394 ,(1987) , 10.1080/01621459.1987.10478441
Paul R. Rosenbaum, Conditional Permutation Tests and the Propensity Score in Observational Studies Journal of the American Statistical Association. ,vol. 79, pp. 565- 574 ,(1984) , 10.1080/01621459.1984.10478082
Robert L. Kane, Judith Garrard, Joan L. Buchanan, Alan Rosenfeld, Carol Skay, Susan McDermott, Improving Primary Care in Nursing Homes Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. ,vol. 39, pp. 359- 367 ,(1991) , 10.1111/J.1532-5415.1991.TB02900.X
Bradley Efron, The Efficiency of Logistic Regression Compared to Normal Discriminant Analysis Journal of the American Statistical Association. ,vol. 70, pp. 892- 898 ,(1975) , 10.1080/01621459.1975.10480319