Fee-Shifting Rules in Litigation with Contingency Fees

作者: Kong-Pin Chen , Jue-Shyan Wang

DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.798044

关键词:

摘要: This paper theoretically compares the British and American fee-shifting rules in their influences on behavior of litigants outcomes litigation. We build up a comprehensive litigation model with asymmetric information agency costs, solve for equilibria under both rules. thereby compare equilibrium settlement amounts rates, expenditures incurred trials, as well plaintiff's chances winning incentive to sue. The theoretical results are broadly consistent existing empirical evidence.

参考文章(38)
The English rule for allocating legal costs : evidence confronts theory Journal of Law Economics & Organization. ,vol. 6, pp. 345- 380 ,(1989) , 10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.JLEO.A036996
Ronald Braeutigam, Bruce Owen, John Panzar, An Economic Analysis of Alternative Fee Shifting Systems Law and Contemporary Problems. ,vol. 47, pp. 173- 186 ,(1984) , 10.2307/1191439
Albert A. Ehrenzweig, Reimbursement of Counsel Fees and the Great Society California Law Review. ,vol. 54, pp. 792- ,(1966) , 10.15779/Z38HR1Z
I. P. L. P'ng, Strategic Behavior in Suit, Settlement, and Trial The Bell Journal of Economics. ,vol. 14, pp. 539- 550 ,(1983) , 10.2307/3003655
Jennifer F. Reinganum, Louis L. Wilde, Settlement, Litigation, and the Allocation of Litigation Costs The RAND Journal of Economics. ,vol. 17, pp. 557- 566 ,(1986) , 10.2307/2555481
James W. Hughes, Edward A. Snyder, Litigation and Settlement under the English and American Rules: Theory and Evidence The Journal of Law and Economics. ,vol. 38, pp. 225- 250 ,(1995) , 10.1086/467330
Karl Wärneryd, In Defense of Lawyers: Moral Hazard as an Aid to Cooperation Games and Economic Behavior. ,vol. 33, pp. 145- 158 ,(2000) , 10.1006/GAME.1999.0774
Bruce L. Hay, Contingent Fees and Agency Costs The Journal of Legal Studies. ,vol. 25, pp. 503- 533 ,(1996) , 10.1086/467987