Good and bad examples of siting and building biosafety level 4 laboratories: a study of Winnipeg, Galveston and Etobicoke

作者: Ragnar Löfstedt

DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3894(02)00038-9

关键词:

摘要: The purpose of this paper is to evaluate successful and unsuccessful examples siting building biosafety level 4 (BSL-4) facilities in North America. shows that well thought-out risk communication strategies, are proactive nature, needed counteract both public trust negative media amplification. suggests such which combine tools including briefings, fora, focus groups, tours the proposed facility, open frequent with as much possible do work.

参考文章(33)
M. Enserink, VIROLOGY:Learning the Hard Way Science. ,vol. 288, pp. 1322- 1322 ,(2000) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.288.5470.1322
Ortwin Renn, Risk communication and the social amplification of risk Springer Netherlands. pp. 287- 324 ,(1991) , 10.1007/978-94-009-1952-5_14
George Cvetkovich, Timothy C. Earle, Social Trust: Toward a Cosmopolitan Society ,(1995)
Ortwin Renn, Debra Levine, Credibility and trust in risk communication Springer, Dordrecht. pp. 175- 217 ,(1991) , 10.1007/978-94-009-1952-5_10
Cecilia Albin, The role of fairness in negotiation Negotiation Journal. ,vol. 9, pp. 223- 244 ,(1993) , 10.1007/BF01000696
M. Enserink, VIROLOGY:The Boom in Biosafety Labs Science. ,vol. 288, pp. 1320- 1322 ,(2000) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.288.5470.1320
Ragnar E. Lofstedt, Ortwin Renn, The Brent Spar Controversy: An Example of Risk Communication Gone Wrong Risk Analysis. ,vol. 17, pp. 131- 136 ,(1997) , 10.1111/J.1539-6924.1997.TB00852.X
H. Peyton Young, Equity: In Theory and Practice ,(1994)
Paul C. Stern, Learning through conflict: a realistic strategy for risk communication' Policy Sciences. ,vol. 24, pp. 99- 119 ,(1991) , 10.1007/BF00146466